The rat is assigned to the review, not the escort or the reviewer. The rat symbol appears in the list for both the escort and the reviewer. In this case it's fairly important that it appears in the escort's list, because a negative review without the rat would look a genuine negative review.
“I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
“All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.
Banned User
Certified E-I Addict
As I understand it E-I very very rarely delete reviews and I only help out and wish to not become anymore then a helper in reviews so would leave a decision to delete to Sarah to decide on. I only delete reviews that are duplicates submitted on same day which happens sometimes or 2nd or 3rd reviews or reviews that break rules. This one does not as I see it break the rules as such and so it comes under a judgment call for those higher up the reviews chain then I wish to be to make a call on deletion. So all I can do is collate the various info when I find something that merits pointing out and place a note. I would say that reading that review most people would come away with a positive view of her and her honesty in dealing with a difficult situation.Originally Posted by MrFussy
I would point out the people should not automatically equate a rat with the Escort having done anything wrong, in this case its clear when people read it that she was very honest and did not take advantage of his being 4 sheets to the wind and shows she is an honest person.
Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 18-03-10 at 20:15.
Banned User
Certified E-I Addict
Exactly, all I do is piece together what anyone submits in review and options choosen and join date/first review etc and tally that with anything other reviews have said that contradict his statements. If something.... "anything" does not smell right I will point it out without fear nor favor to either party. Its for people to decide to take note of it or not. Someone said to post IP links and I do that when I see it and state who they link to. I will be doing exactly that soon for two people well known here who according to IP data they have posted reviews for same escort with two profiles.
One has two trusted reviewer badges and the other none but well know here and I say also this does not mean they are the same person but i will post links on the relevant reviews again with a view to people having the option to rule in or rule out the IP link as relevant or not.
People have been calling for a tightening up reviews and that is exactly what I intend to contribute to and all my efforts are with a view to stating facts and some will not like the facts that will be posted but they are facts none the less.
Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 18-03-10 at 23:14.
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 021629 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies
here is first time review today that looks fake. Not written by a native English speaker and quick off the mark with the review. Could be wrong but one of those reviews that doesnt have any credibility imo
"I met Chloe yestreday and i was really surprised. The comunication was fast and she was really kind in answering the phone. She looks better then in the pics (very bad photograf she chose) and she likes all her favourites. I hope to see her again. Really lovely girl, not proffesional, more GFE, but this i really like...Not time watcher and not pressing me...for me it was really good meeting"
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote