There is no fairness issue. There never was. The rules were the same for all escorts before. The rules are the same for all escorts now. The issue is not fairness.
Where was the massive abuse of the old system? People weren't playing "drop one, keep one" on it. For the most part, the replies to ads were relevant. You can see the list of threads in the Female Independent Escorts section, sorted by number of posts,
here. The one for Touring Escorts is
here. For anyone who doesn't want to bother following the links:
- There were never many replies, compared to General Chat or Soap Opera.
- There was not any sudden increase before the rules were changed. Most of the threads with lots of replies were 2008 or earlier. You can see from the list below that almost all were for escorts who are now retired.
- There is nothing to suggest than any particular escort's ads were dominating the advertising forums. If you look at the twenty most replied ad threads, they were started by sexybabehere (77), Blondy (44), Busty Malena (42), Gabriela.Brazil (40), nikki (40), donna (40), Gabriella.Brazil (40), SEXY_SPAIN (37), Blondy (36), punkchick (36), Blond chick NIKKY (36), exclusive.emma (36), ennisneedslife (35), Miss X (35), xxsandraxx (34), Busty Carmen (32), Damien (32), Monica_3891 (30), Packo (30), and Mia (29).
You can also sort threads by the number of times they have been viewed. If you look through the 200 most viewed ad threads you will see that
all of them are from before the rules changed. Escorts want people to read their ads. The new rules are clearly not working from that point of view. I don't know about Patricia, but if I were running an escort advertising site and people weren't looking at the ads then I would start to get worried.