Originally Posted by
FredBiscuits
No, I didn't.
I believe answers like this need to be visible to everyone, therefore I ask the questions in public.
The fact the rules were linked in the award post, and it seems like there was at least 3 other providers who should have ranked higher than the announced winner if those rules were correctly applied seems either unfair, an error, or something is deemed to have happened. I think each option there, someone has a right to know, primarily the competitors, but the client pool has some interest there too.