You can!!
I used to always login and also review using one
I didn't know it wasn't allowed
SofiaTheMod contacted me and told me one of my reviews was denied because of this or I'd still be doing it none the wiser
My problem at the time was that my phone network had put an internet security on my account for anything 🔞
without asking or informing me and they were charging me for it 🤬
So anytime I tried to login without VPN
my phone wouldn't allow it
My problem was the girl at the time who I wanted to leave a review for and I was extremely fond of was leaving soon
I tried everything searching Google for solutions to no avail
finally I bit the bullet and contacted my service provider/network
(I always find it odd when you all call the girls that, dispite knowing what you mean)
But how do you ask!?
" Can't access Escort Ireland could you please help" 😆😂🤣
Got it sorted anyhow
the guy explained why it was happening and removed it along with the charge!!
(I didn't mention the site, not a complete dumbass)
So over the phone he can remotely see my internet and says
" Please try now to access one of the sites that you've been restricted from so we know the problem has been resolved" 😯😲😳🥵
"Ah don't worry mate I trust you thanks a lot for your time have a good day"
and hung up!!
SofiaTheMod was very understanding once I got it sorted and my review was posted in the nick of time!!
I'd have hated to disappoint the girl
I miss SofiaTheMod and the girl obviously!!
EscortInspector (08-05-24), IAmLIAm (11-05-24), TonyB (12-05-24)
Correct Tony - can't be done, deleted and not included in EOTM. Amor was given a one-off exception upon explanation to mod, presume his decent rep. stood him too.
all the EOTM threads got closed due to speculation so I'll post this here. isn't ironic the below example/posts
we have our rat review/fake updated which disqualified both Dora & Dieve from the competition
hope this helps anyone concerned some transparency/clarity and Liam to calm down (Luana still to be accounted).
have a great weekend folks. weather/life far too nice to be in here
Last edited by BarryD; 09-05-24 at 17:42.
AmorInfinito8 (09-05-24), EscortInspector (11-05-24), Rooney2808 (10-05-24), TonyB (12-05-24)
MrTony recently created a new account, that's why all of his reviews got ratmarked, not just ours. He even commented on his own thread complimenting how great it is 🤦🏻 This obviously cannot disqualify anyone retroactively, as it happened long after the competition was over, and providers are not liable for their client's authenticity beyond their own reviews. If they were, it would be quite easy to suicide-review someone by visiting as a good boy, then having himself ratmarked afterwards to have several escorts disqualified despite the genuine meets 🙃
Especially easy for his future visits. Provider doesn't know his username before the meet. Bam, gets a ratmarked review for a genuine meet, simply because the user's all future reviews are automatically ratmarked. I doubt the provider deserves to be disqualified because she unknowingly accepted a ratmarked client. Have a great weekend.
Last edited by Dieve; 11-05-24 at 04:14. Reason: 🖕🏻😼🖕🏻
Corsasport (12-05-24), FullIrish (29-05-24), IAmLIAm (11-05-24), Larrii (11-05-24), oddball (11-05-24), PhilPhilPhil (11-05-24), WellDressed (11-05-24)
Dieve (11-05-24)
EscortInspector (11-05-24), rockonallnite (11-05-24), WellDressed (11-05-24)
It seems to me a bit of an oddity given that the main reason most probably register with the site is to leave feedback because of escorts, so penalizing them like this seems a little unfair, especially given they have no ability to screen the reviews (which would raise a whole other list of problems, e.g. blocking ones they just don't like).
I do understand the risk of an escort padding her score with fake reviews but surely there's a better approach?
Dieve (11-05-24), IAmLIAm (11-05-24), WellDressed (11-05-24)
we are told 1/3 of a version of a story in the MrTony scenario, other side and the truth are missing
stamping a mouse icon on a Provider isn't something E-I would do lightly unless good reason, not seen it in current times.
E-I cover both avenues, Punter and Provider with the icon because they may not be able to prove either way, who instigated/canvassed for the fake.
concerns are also being raised by Providers on the sheer volume of reviews some are culminating on a day by day / week by week / month by month basis and how the numbers being achieved are unrealistic. also some Punter/Provider relationships which have been highlighted, point towards v. questionable character with unhealthy plans/schemes
Ultimately folks make up their own minds how they see it.
who I feel most for is the salt of the earth/genuine ladies advertising, who go out of their way to be professional and do so with class, dignity and respect, who get tricked and deceived by it.
EscortInspector (12-05-24)