Fake Profile Reviews

[BarryD]

I don't think you can review using a VPN.

You can!!

Correct Tony - can't be done, deleted and not included in EOTM. Amor was given a one-off exception upon explanation to mod, presume his decent rep. stood him too.

all the EOTM threads got closed due to speculation so I'll post this here. isn't ironic the below example/posts
we have our rat review/fake updated which disqualified both Dora & Dieve from the competition
hope this helps anyone concerned some transparency/clarity and Liam to calm down (Luana still to be accounted).
have a great weekend folks. weather/life far too nice to be in here

This was certainly a month where I heard so many different slants on the rules.
No second review counts within the month and can't win two months in a row .That all checked in for me ok but when I heard the reviewer had to have minimum 10 reviews already and that even if the reviewer reviewed the escort last year it didn't count that was news to me .
Then I heard if the escort gets under 5 stars in a review its 3 points deducted .
If its a bad review it's 5 points deducted.
Like I really lost all knowledge of the rule...come to think of it I knew then I had no knowledge or are they picking up things that we folks on the outside just don't see .
Anyway, the fact is I don't think we really need to be analytical on it ..Its fun but maybe the escorts can take a lot of it to heart.

Surely repeat business is far greater that winning EOTM ?

if we took yourself just as an example you left a review for both Dieve and Dora this month, if one of those was a fake then it could be a case that both ladies get disqualified, based on the fake, not just 1. some of the lads use that as a yardstick to decide who they visit and/or which handles they might trust as reviewers to consider/read if deciding on a visit.

it's a bit of fun for me/you but the business, can be like most businesses, cut-throat and ruthless. it shows also, despite some of the comments, there is a certain prestige to the winner, everything helps.

[Dieve]

all the EOTM threads got closed due to speculation so I'll post this here. isn't ironic the below example/posts
we have our rat review/fake updated which disqualified both Dora & Dieve from the competition
hope this helps anyone concerned some transparency/clarity and Liam to calm down (Luana still to be accounted).
have a great weekend folks.

MrTony recently created a new account, that's why all of his reviews got ratmarked, not just ours. He even commented on his own thread complimenting how great it is 🤦🏻 This obviously cannot disqualify anyone retroactively, as it happened long after the competition was over, and providers are not liable for their client's authenticity beyond their own reviews. If they were, it would be quite easy to suicide-review someone by visiting as a good boy, then having himself ratmarked afterwards to have several escorts disqualified despite the genuine meets 🙃

Especially easy for his future visits. Provider doesn't know his username before the meet. Bam, gets a ratmarked review for a genuine meet, simply because the user's all future reviews are automatically ratmarked. I doubt the provider deserves to be disqualified because she unknowingly accepted a ratmarked client. Have a great weekend.

[Barney Rubble]

MrTony recently created a new account, that's why all of his reviews got ratmarked, not just ours. He even commented on his own thread complimenting how great it is ���� This obviously cannot disqualify anyone retroactively, as it happened long after the competition was over, and providers are not liable for their client's authenticity beyond their own reviews. If they were, it would be quite easy to suicide-review someone by visiting as a good boy, then having himself ratmarked afterwards to have several escorts disqualified despite the genuine meets ��

Especially easy for his future visits. Provider doesn't know his username before the meet. Bam, gets a ratmarked review for a genuine meet, simply because the user's all future reviews are automatically ratmarked. I doubt the provider deserves to be disqualified because she unknowingly accepted a ratmarked client. Have a great weekend.

So much for giving him a second chance...

[BarryD]

So much for giving him a second chance...