EOTM Rules

[IAmLIAm]

Even on that front, if it was the case that all the high single digits had previously passed the required threshold (seems unlikely that all of them have, but let's go with it), one of them is a repeat reviewer from last month, so it should be 10.

Either the rules have changed, or the counting has been messed up a bit.

I did a basic skim of some of the other top reviewed folk last month, and I think a few of them should have scored higher than the eventual winner, if the scoring was done by the rules that are linked in my initial post here, and linked under this month's announcement.

Again, it might seem like I am trying to take away from Juliette's win, and I'm really not, but is seems unfair to change the rules, unannounced (assuming it wasn't announced of the Escort's side of the forum), when I know a lot of providers to whom EOTM matters, go other of their way to maximise their chances of winning.

Ah, well... Guess I failed my research project. It just seems really odd to me to have multiple reviews and end up with a prime number score....

It is a bit weird to "remind" everyone of the scoring convention and then not have the scoring align with said convention... If the scoring had changed then why not post the new metric?

I do also agree that one can point out the flaws in a system without it diminishing someone's achievement. I have a great amount of respect for anyone who can make a living (or supplement their living) in this profession. The mental, physical and emotional fortitude required must be immense and deserving of adulation.