Originally Posted by whiteknight111
I agree
I agree
Who do I trust? I trust me!
Established Member
Becoming Addicted to E-I
I have this idea that there is a 'fake quotient' which would be an indicator to how genuine a particular escorts reviews are. It would look something like this;
a-{(bx5)+(cx5)}
d
where a=the sum of all reviews made by all positive reviewers of the escort
b=the sum of all reviews made by all negative reviewers of the escort
c=the sum of all once-off reviews over 3 months old(I believe most are fake)
d=the sum of all reviews of the escort
The higher the number produced by this formula for a particular escort, the higher the probability thet the the escort is good and has genuine reviews. I know that this is very imperfect but it is only intended as an indication. If the number of reviews are displayed alongside the reviewers name, the quotient would be quick and easy to work out.
Unfortunately, the quotient will be distorted by the multiple pimp or 'backscratcher' reviews that some rings have developed but I still think that it will help.
Your number will be negative for any new escort with max 5 reviews and at least one review from any single reviewerThere are also genuine reviewers with one review, not all of them are fake.
Banned User
Certified E-I Addict
I am half expecting/half dreading pie charts to make an appearance soon...
Jesus Lads you can't reduce such a subjective and intimate experience to equations that only Einstein could muster a hard on for.
There is merit in the unknown diamond that gets discovered by taking a chance now and then...
Smart men, don't get me wrong but this is getting into a beautiful mind territory when its really about finding a beautiful body for 30/60 minutes and that ain't rocket science.
Put down the slide rule and take a deep breath lads.
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
I could just imagine one of my former maths lecturers using a formula like that. But it wouldn't be for me. I rather use biological methods
Help Keyla in her fight with cancer. Every little helps.
It could happen to any of us.
https://gofund.me/8e340537
Established Member
Becoming Addicted to E-I
Like De Beers, I like to use science to help me find the diamonds in the rough
Seriously though, I would have no intention to do the actual maths. The point is that an escort with some bad reviews and a lot of one-off reviews will stand out if the number of reviews are indicated after the reviewers name.
Banned User
Certified E-I Addict
Yes but science has also come up with ways to make fake diamondsLike De Beers, I like to use science to help me find the diamonds in the rough
Seriously though, I would have no intention to do the actual maths. The point is that an escort with some bad reviews and a lot of one-off reviews will stand out if the number of reviews are indicated after the reviewers name.
Established Member
Becoming Addicted to E-I
It is important to understand that this is only an aide in trying to identify the con artists who continuously post good reviews of themselves. At best, it will throw up more candidates for Whitenight to investigateYes but science has also come up with ways to make fake diamonds
I agree that this is a good idea, but it won't really tell you very much except for the escorts who have a lot of reviews. In fact, nearly all escorts have lots of reviews from people with few reviews. And some fake reviewers have written many reviews. So having reviews from people with few reviews isn't necessarily bad and having reviews from people with many reviews isn't necessarily good. You need a lot of reviews before you can see a pattern in the numbers.
I'm not opposed to your idea of listing numbers of reviews after names. I think it's a good idea, but I think we should all have a realistic idea of how much information you can expect to get from a review without actually reading it.
“I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
“All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.
Hear hear Qph, I would never reduce a woman to an equation. This whole area is just so subjective and prone to exaggeration as well as faking, that you might as well shove a carrot up your arse in an attempt to analyse how it tastes. On this occasion you should be listening to what your body is telling you about who or what it enjoys and leave the mind masturbation exercises for pseudo-intellectual sites.
Instead of equations that Einstein would have been proud of, a simple E-I (ejaculation index) would suffice. If your mickeys could talk, what would they say? In Ex P's case........................ probably "leave me alone ffs".
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
