Thats fair enough but please just try and keep the U*squared^overpietimes< to a minimum as its giving me a headacheOriginally Posted by adogwithabone
Banned User
Certified E-I Addict
Thats fair enough but please just try and keep the U*squared^overpietimes< to a minimum as its giving me a headache
Hear hear Qph, I would never reduce a woman to an equation. This whole area is just so subjective and prone to exaggeration as well as faking, that you might as well shove a carrot up your arse in an attempt to analyse how it tastes. On this occasion you should be listening to what your body is telling you about who or what it enjoys and leave the mind masturbation exercises for pseudo-intellectual sites.
Instead of equations that Einstein would have been proud of, a simple E-I (ejaculation index) would suffice. If your mickeys could talk, what would they say? In Ex P's case........................ probably "leave me alone ffs".
Banned User
Certified E-I Addict
Might be no harm if reviews also showed how many times its been viewed just as threads show this. Might show whose reviews are shown a high interest in or that might relate to reviewers higher standing among peers.
There is no harm indeed in this but I guess this statistic would be of little or no importance when deciding to see an escort. Sometimes it may be misleading in regard of escorts' popularity, some people will always read the fake and negative reviews in the latest review section, just out of curiosity.
(Currently posting using ID "Sensual Delights")
"""Why can't we rate escorts out of 10 here?
We don't use the rate out of 10 system because we think it is much better to ask escort clients if they are very dissatisfied, fairly dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, fairly satisfied or very satisfied. We think the asking for marks out of ten system is far less effective, because different people's perceptions of how good or bad 1/10, 2/10 etc is vary. Our way might not be the way of other escort review websites, but it is the right way we think, and you may note it is also the preferred way of most survey professionals these days we think. """
Above text is from E-I review FAQ so E-I is against rating escorts at present with numbers.
However I believe it is possible to defeat the vast majority of fake reviewers with maths.
The system could be defeated by a reviewer ring but they would have to be clever.
The system
Its kind of similar to what EL gordo does by hand every month
Each review could be feed into a formula based on its inputs
this formula would assign a number to this review out of 10.
The escorts reviews could then be averaged out to give a reliabity score.
which could be put next to each escorts name together with no of reviews they have
The input varibles from each review to the formula could be as follows
is it ratted?
Satisfaction ratting?***
No of previous reviews?
Trusted reviewer?
No of messge board posts?
***could be an average of all the question asked for a rating in the review.
So an unratted review from a trusted reviewer with plenty of previous reviews
and message boards posts and a very satisfied rating for all questions would be a 10
a ratted review from untrusted reviewer with no reviews or posts would be close to zero.
Escorts could be listed by reliablity score or no of reviews or both.
Getting the weighting of variables and the formula right would take a bit of time
but wouldn't be that hard. The whole thing could work automated once set up.
As a start E-I should due what has proposed at start of thread put the no of reviews reviewer had next to name, this is in the works as already mentioned.
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
Nothing is more important.......
And Patricia has been working on my..........centre parting *cough cough* for aged now...........I can see the old cynics eyebrows raising from here but yes she is indeed working on something far more important and no its not Luther's center parting. (though that is given far to high a priority with her imo)
When reading reviews, please exercise common sence.............no need for the maths..........
"It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
L
I think the EI have now implemented your suggestion.
Well done adogwithabone
Who do I trust? I trust me!
Established Member
Becoming Addicted to E-I
Well done E-I. They also seem to have sorted out the 'best escort league' by disregarding fake reviews that some escorts have been posting to make them seem more popular. Sara and Rafaela have both taken a dive.
Yes that's a very good move, it's much easier to assess an escort's bona fides at a glance by the amount of (1)s on the review page.
Queen of Tarts
Certified E-I Addict
Thanks. Luckily both these suggestions were good ideas and easy enough for us to do, so I got them done without too much nerd whipping! Any other good ideas that we could impliment easily, keep them coming in!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
