WellDressed (27-03-24)
PhilPhilPhil (28-03-24), Rooney2808 (27-03-24)
"agency" "receptionist". do you hear yourselves?
See the problem is, and what society and politics and etc etc completely refuse to acknowledge, there's far more girls wanting to get INTO prostitution, than there are get out of it.
That goes completely against the conventional narrative, the one where they "must be trafficked, cause no woman would willingly do such a thing".
And for active workers they're not really going to contradict that narrative cause........ they're just not.
But the reality is, as above.
So we have 1) girls wanting to get into prostitution and work as sex workers, and 2) a political/social system which condemns it on the basis of what they believe.
The result being, the swaths of potential workers, are driven into the hands of this silly fat, degenerate, bottom feeding filth, cause they're the only ones that are actively facilitating those who want to practice.
i.e. travel, accommodation, whatever else goes into it.
AmyTantraMassage (27-03-24)
Two apparently conflicting views of how things work from two independent and experienced sex workers, Amy and Michelle. Where does that leave the client as an outsider ?
Unfortunate truth. It's important to bear in mind that for a provider, posting here = marketing.
No escort wants her business impacted.
I've found even mentioning things in the warning section as an example, has some providers attacking me in other threads, because they feel outlining the cold/hard reality of things could impact their business.
This is unfortunate of course as, it's basically prioritizing profits ahead of safety and integrity of practice.
It's just important to bear in mind that providers are going to create a narrative which casts themselves in the best possible light, portrays the practice in the best possible light, conceals some less savory truths, and ultimately stimulates their business.
Which I'm sure is perfectly fine....... but up to a point.
Last edited by InsidiousCid; 28-03-24 at 18:09.