Why has this review been allowed??

[MrFussy]

yes anon you are right it could have been dealt with a bit better, so here is another lesson learnt for me, therefore i can improve on myself, my service & handling a bad review situation, but i did point out too that rules were the main focus also. This section about reviews is improving the reviews system whilst highlighting issues and fake reviews so that they can be dealt with accordingly.
Oh and im delighted that ive moved to your Ladies Id like To See list xxxxx

And so is this the end of this thread, which in reality started when someone was allowed to post a review older than 3 months..when will this change? Allow a week, if the escort is no longer available, have a facility to post 1 week beyond their profile expiring...after that i.e 1 week, no review allowed.....

[jayf1]

After you were told numerous times, that perhaps a mistake had been made, then perhaps it is you who has the problem. But it's nice to know that you hold mods in such high esteem that you don't think us fallible, human, or capable of making a small mistake..........

I thank you for your faith.........

at the time it was not a fact it was still in dispute because at the time there were 2 mods with diffrent details and as soon as the mods got their act together and said it was a mistake the matter was cleared up and that still does not make any diffrence to the way you responded to my post by attacking me.
also i dont have any faith in you i feel you are nothing but a bully that has let the small bit of power that modding has giving to you go to your head and make you feel untouchable and think you have the right to abuse other site members as you like.

[Quarterpoundher]

at the time it was not a fact it was still in dispute because at the time there were 2 mods with diffrent details and as soon as the mods got their act together and said it was a mistake the matter was cleared up and that still does not make any diffrence to the way you responded to my post by attacking me.

Our act was actually just fine all the while. I showed you proof and Carlos posted to clear up the matter. We are not here all at the same time, all of the time so you are going to have to accept a little lag time in response when one or another is gone. We are not is same office or something so not realistic to expect when one mod say's one thing and another is required to confirm that they are always going to be on standby to post straight after like you are expecting.

[jayf1]

Our act was actually just fine all the while. I showed you proof and Carlos posted to clear up the matter. We are not here all at the same time, all of the time so you are going to have to accept a little lag time in response when one or another is gone. We are not is same office or something so not realistic to expect when one mod say's one thing and another is required to confirm that they are always going to be on standby to post straight after like you are expecting.

fair enough but none of that excuses the way a site mod "luther" responded by saying in the main title of his post "you must have fcuk all else to complain about" or do all the site mods think that that is a proper way to respond to a site member????

[luther]

you responded to my post by attacking me.
also i dont have any faith in you i feel you are nothing but a bully that has let the small bit of power that modding has giving to you go to your head and make you feel untouchable and think you have the right to abuse other site members as you like.

Abuse you???

I think you're going a bit overboard here...........

Yes, I have no problem admitting that I am at times somewhat assertive in my posting, I speak my mind, but I would hardly describe the post that you are referring to as "attacking", "abusive" or "bullying"............

If I offend people in my posting style, then I apologise, I don't intend it to be attacking, abusive or bullying. I must remember that some people here must be very sensitive.............

But after you pointed out something here, and you were told it was a mistake, numerous times. Why you couldn't accept that, I just don't know..............

[jayf1]

Abuse you???

I think you're going a bit overboard here...........

Yes, I have no problem admitting that I am at times somewhat assertive in my posting, I speak my mind, but I would hardly describe the post that you are referring to as "attacking", "abusive" or "bullying"............

If I offend people in my posting style, then I apologise, I don't intend it to be attacking, abusive or bullying. I must remember that some people here must be very sensitive.............

But after you pointed out something here, and you were told it was a mistake, numerous times. Why you couldn't accept that, I just don't know..............

its not that i couldnt accept it at the time it was as far as the fourm was concerned still in dispute because at the time carlos had not cleared the matter up and at the time i even said we would have to wait untill carlos responded as it was him who made the claim that he has some evedience and as soon as carlos did respond the matter was cleared up and i cant understand why you cant accept that fact as its clearly stated in some of my earlyer posts.

[jayf1]

luther you are also wrong about me being told numerous times that it was a mistake when in fact i was only told once that it was a mistake before you posted that abusive post and then carlos cleared the matter up if you contuine to make the false claims about the ammount of times i was told i will have no choice but to make a formal complaint about your behaviour to the site owner.

[luther]

luther you are also wrong about me being told numerous times that it was a mistake when in fact i was only told once that it was a mistake before you posted that abusive post

can i just point out that according to another mod "carlos" he registered one id on the 4th and another on the 10th wich is 6 days appart if my math is correct and that does not check out with mr serious's posts or what you have said.

1

No, he created both on the same day. The 4th of Feb. We need to give him a break here, he has been honest and stated what time of year review was, maybe late in doing so but he still did it and what he says about his profiles checks out.

i have to say i find it a bit strange that one mod says he has ip proof that they were created 6 days appart and another mod says no the same day. who are we to believe you or carlos???

2

Its called being human, I am sure Carlos will confirm what i am saying. There is proof of two profiles belonging to him but they were not created days apart but on the same day, 4th of Feb.

only if he goes back on what he said about having proof that they were created 6 days appart and i really hope he does not because i have always found carlos to be honest and claiming to have proof of something when there is no proof is something that a site mod should never do.

heres the post i'm talking about.

3

And here are both profiles date of creation... (see att. pics).

4

Fine. I can do no more then show you both his profile creation dates as shown on pics.

The man is human, if he made a mistake he made a mistake, what's the big fascination with this? It's an honest mistake, let it go man..........

if you contuine to make the false claims about the ammount of times i was told i will have no choice but to make a formal complaint about your behaviour to the site owner.

And that's your prerogative...........

I'm finished.............

[jayf1]

1



2





3

4





And that's your prerogative...........

I'm finished.............

you just proved my point only in one of them was it hinted that it was a mistake. and now show me the word mistake anywhere in any of them apart from your abusive post where you didnt include the main title to your post that said "you must have fcuk all else to complain about"

[luther]

All the rest are still trying to convince you of it...............

Jayf1, I have better things to be doing than going around in circles about this...........

Please don't be insulted or offended if I don't reply here again. I've apologised if my posting style was offensive but I see you've ignored that. I don't think I needed to apologise in the first instance but I did in the hope that you could drop the matter, and I certainly won't be doing it here again.........