Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 101

Thread: Why has this review been allowed??

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    838
    Reviews
    1

    Default Ah please

    Quote Originally Posted by Quarterpoundher View Post
    So your taking the George Lee approach and packing your bags and not working from within to aid reviews?

    You may not realize it but genuine reviewers are aiding reviews simply by posting them.
    Please QPH, over 50 reviews, most of my posts are in relation to reviews, fakes etc. I am not doing a GL, I just think when it comes to escorts, who I know are genuine, wanting to opt out, then action is needed. I cannot stand the can't remember when or more recently a new user posting positive reviews for escorts met ages ago...Jesus, if it was that good, post when the memory is fresh...Anyways action is required, it's been needed for a long time in relation to reviews and the verified/changing photos situation but nothing done. So for me, no more reviews, unlike GL I will still be active, just not contributing to the reviews.....

  2. #42
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,355

    Default

    I just mean that the fewer genuine reviews posted in order to make a valid protest that the pool of trustworthy reviews in among the dross get more and more diluted.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    838
    Reviews
    1

    Default I agree

    Quote Originally Posted by Quarterpoundher View Post
    I just mean that the fewer genuine reviews posted in order to make a valid protest that the pool of trustworthy reviews in among the dross get more and more diluted.
    The problems need to be addressed, i.e. fake / bogus / fantasy reviews, photo verification. The dross is now the norm, action is required and I don't see why I should comply with the current system, which is not even being enforced....let it dilute further, then perhaps something will change...I hope it does change soon.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrFussy View Post
    The problems need to be addressed, i.e. fake / bogus / fantasy reviews, photo verification. The dross is now the norm, action is required and I don't see why I should comply with the current system, which is not even being enforced....let it dilute further, then perhaps something will change...I hope it does change soon.
    No one asking you to comply, only have your say on the Escorts you saw and let people who may have faith in your reviews see them. A field of wheat always has its weeds.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    5,608
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    95

    Default weeds

    Quote Originally Posted by Quarterpoundher View Post
    No one asking you to comply, only have your say on the Escorts you saw and let people who may have faith in your reviews see them. A field of wheat always has its weeds.
    Problem here now we have a field of weeds and very little wheat
    Blatant promotion should be outlawed
    but
    Vincent Browne is a Hero

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    838
    Reviews
    1

    Default Wheat

    Quote Originally Posted by Quarterpoundher View Post
    No one asking you to comply, only have your say on the Escorts you saw and let people who may have faith in your reviews see them. A field of wheat always has its weeds.
    Comply as in appearing to agree with the system...even wheat fields need thorough harvesting...otherwise the weeds takes over...

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    310
    Reviews
    18

    Default this girl

    Quote Originally Posted by Quarterpoundher View Post
    No one asking you to comply, only have your say on the Escorts you saw and let people who may have faith in your reviews see them. A field of wheat always has its weeds.
    This girl is a lovely lady. I don't know what happened between the two people.... however, I have met her twice and I have found her to be lovely.

    I think that it is important to remember that revews are based on chemistry as much as anything else and maybe the two pwoplw involved did not have that chemistry. In any event, this story as with so many more has been blown out of all proportion. He didn't like her, she responded and now we are all giving our two cents worth.

    I am a reader rather than a writer of reviews and am aware that I will be roasted because of that. I can take it..... If I had something to add, I would do so. Some people are better at reviewing than others, in the same way that some mods are better at some aspects of moderating than others..

    Does this make sense to everyone? or even, anyone?

    BLD

  8. Default

    [QUOTE=I will still be active, just not contributing to the reviews.....[/QUOTE]


    Mr Fussy I understand your frustration but I think you'd be doing more harm than good by opting out of reviews.
    Also, for me (never mind the badge) you are one of my most Trusted Reviewers and I truely value your recommendations.
    I think that goes for the majority of regular users of EI too.
    Please don't strop reviewing ... You'd be too big a loss to this community!!
    If you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with! X


  9. #49
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrFussy View Post
    Comply as in appearing to agree with the system...even wheat fields need thorough harvesting...otherwise the weeds takes over...
    Thats what I am saying, honest reviews are the wheat, you are saying that instead of allowing others to reap what you had sown you will instead plow your reviews into the soil before being harvested by those who might go on your recommendations.

    I am saying that yes weed control is needed, however what type? there are only two ways to control the weeds in reviews.

    Organic... IE the way things are and we muddle along picking out the odd one we get IP info for an never really getting anywhere.

    or

    We nuke reviews with every spray known to man and delete anything with a whiff of being fake even when that is just a vague hunch.

    That requires forum to get on board and agree to that or else we will be accused of being to heavy handed.

    For instance there are lots of reviews being placed lately by profiles that have all joined up on same day, none have any other link, nothing but same date of joining.

    So

    What do we do?

    Delete all of them including a few real ones that might be among them?

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    838
    Reviews
    1

    Default Thanks

    Quote Originally Posted by WhenLoveComesToTown View Post
    Mr Fussy I understand your frustration but I think you'd be doing more harm than good by opting out of reviews.
    Also, for me (never mind the badge) you are one of my most Trusted Reviewers and I truely value your recommendations.
    I think that goes for the majority of regular users of EI too.
    Please don't strop reviewing ... You'd be too big a loss to this community!!
    No, it's gone too far when you can read the latest reviews and spot the bogus one's, the can't remember syndrome etc. Also it's not fair on girls either that some are fake but not reported as such. People can PM me and I'll give details of girls I have visited but that's it from me until things improve.

Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •