Registered User
Reviews/Value for Money
In another thread there was a discussion about value for money being included in the reviews.
Value is as Oscar Wilde said in the eye of the beholder and relative.
I think it depends on what one thinks one is measuring, looks, service, personality, location, venue, drinks, hygiene.
The experience and the value reflects all of the above as some of the SPs go the extra mile regarding the accommodation which makes a big difference to the experience.
64west (22-02-24),Irelandbeautyyy (25-02-24), Larrii (22-02-24)
Established Member
Becoming Addicted to E-I
Couple of my reviews have lowered overall exp, satisfaction, accuracy of photos & location but every review I have posted is full physical appearance & VFM. Always both full because of how i am very selective with who I do business with.
Small contradiction, If accuracy of photos and physical appearance are both less than 4star I don’t post a review. I just learn how to avoid it.
(Side note, AOP gets the point across. I think Physical Appearance should be removed a changed to something different).
I am selective of who I choose and I don’t take others user reviews too literal so I have had a long run of 4s and 5star experiences. In the 12-14 years using EI, I can count on one hand the exp’s that were less full VFM.
How I see VFM there’s two sides, We are definitely gifting enough from the client side but they are worth soo much more from a neutral view. I’m sure many would agree.
Launcelot (22-02-24)
Established Member
Becoming Addicted to E-I
I think would be interesting to see a sixth star added. Where you can only choose one to add it.
VFM
❇️❇️❇️❇️❇️
Ovr Exp
❇️❇️❇️❇️❇️
Acc of Photo
❇️❇️❇️❇️❇️
Satisfaction
❇️❇️❇️❇️❇️
Location
❇️❇️❇️❇️❇️
The Craic
❇️❇️❇️❇️❇️🌟
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
Originally Posted by 64west
Might not go down to well with girls who have English as a second language and don't understand Irish slang!!
64west (22-02-24)
Established Member
Becoming Addicted to E-I
Agree, it would be the only rating that is accurate but this was a joke example.
I just reviewed a girl who is in early stage of learning a new language. She had plenty good charisma and sense of humour, more than most with a good grasp on the language.
Of course but I guess the VFM stars are rarely looked at. Use different terminology, just no need to refer to money though IMO.
64west (25-02-24)
I allways thought value for money means if you are happy with the girl prices that are shown in her profile and not regret what you spend your money for, hmm does this make any sense?
"Don't worry, be happy!"
"Allways remember to be happy becouse you never know who's falling in love with your smile"
C. J Duggan, "One Summer"
You are absolutely correct Ella and this is the problem. Unfortunately, in this country paying money to an escort for almost all escort services is illegal. One can get into fine arguments about this but in my view any mention of money in a review is not necessary at all.
To be honest I feel the review system is very disrespectful to the ladies. The piece about the rating is particularly appalling. Who am I to rate a lady's physical appearance?. If that's the way God made her and if her photos are verified then there is no need to give a punter the opportunity to degrade her. And value for money???? Jesus you would think you were buying an item and comparing brands, it's disgusting. I'm surprised ladies don't kick up more of a fuss about it. The Ladies body should not be viewed and commented on like an object, like talking about an NCT on an a car !!!
AmorInfinito8 (22-02-24), patpz (22-02-24)
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
Totally agree
I had hourly rate added to one of my reviews in the past dispite putting in £0
but Sofia removed it at my request
I wouldn't want people thinking I have to pay for it
patpz (22-02-24)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote