Just a note

[RicFlair]

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlahBlahBlah View Post
i think stewards inquiry definitely should be called, as RciFlair just making up the rules while he goes along with it at the end of day rule is rule shouldnt be change around whenever suits.

Correct me if im wrong Rules only should be changed before not after the competition is over

Fair enough Ric, I know its your comp and you doing your best for it.

Can You just tell my why there is a rat on the review of me from XPS? I believe that everyone is entitled to know the reason, why it is believed to be fake. If it is because he had a rat on his first review, can we know what was the reason for it, please?

Hmmmmm...

Anna I am sorry you feel cheated. I'm sorry your the only Escort in the 18 months of this competition to feel sore about your loss. But I could of ruled much harder on you. For example...

Google (a trusted reviewer) had his review appointment on the 28th Jan at 9.pm for an hour. Google's review didn't mention if the time was accurate or not. How did this appointment take place Anna as you were posting on E-I at 9.05pm, 9.19pm and 9.53pm on said date? You were also posting later that night too. People can check your stats its all there in the E-I files.

Now if I am to take this as undeniable fact then

1. Google looses his Trusted Reviewer Badge.

2. Google's review is ratted.

3. Anna is disqualified from the Escort of the Month for a month. I've done this before to a previous winner (Patty Baby) so its not a precident.

However instead of doing this I decided to give you the benafit of the doubt. Instead I rooted out two suspect reviews and found you not to be the winner. But you had to feel sore about this. You had to press me on this further. I knew you tried to fix this Comp but I couldn't proove it until I saw Google post on this thread. Google rarely posts ever so when I saw his post in your defence I knew something was up. So I checked up and found the above proof. You are both in this thing together. Anna its discusting. You talk about your "honesty" all the time. I'm sorry madam but your full of it. The stench of bullshit from your reviews for January was over powering. I'm not going to investigate them more because God knows what will be found.

This is the last time I try to let a looser down gentley. I have nothing more to add to this debate. My decision is final. Anna you lost. Google's Trusted Reviewer Badge will most likely be taken away when the new Trusted Reviewer Criteria is announced next week.

End of debate.

Comming soon Trusted Reviewer Criteria.

[RicFlair]

There's more. My review is up there only because I was very persistent. As you know, Ric, you were not planning on posting it. You were not even planning on telling me that you weren't posting it. If you thought there was anything dodgy about my review then you should have contacted me, rather than trying to bury it on the sly.

As you've said, Ric, this is your competition. But what do you mean by that? That you run it? That you set out the rules? Or that you pick the winner?

I've put your name forward for moderation to the board 3 times. And 3 times it was rejected. The Mods find you odd and not totally trustworthy. I didn't realise that until your recent behaviour.

You PM'd me 15 seperate PM's with lists of Rats to be added on reviews. I looked through some of them. Some need Ratting others do not. I asked you to stop PMing me as it was getting ridiculous. I don't work here El Gordo!!! I only help here. You seem to forget that. PM Sarah your lists, she WORKS HERE!!! So after a while I stopped reading your PM's because you were becoming an annoyance. I also didn't try to bury your review of Anna. I simply didn't read your PM for a while because of the above stated reason. I also didn't process your review until I was processing them later that eve. Again Gordy I don't WORK HERE FULL TIME. I have a life outside of here.

Also you said you were going to post my competition results before me! You said that you were going to PM the figures to Escorts aswell because you felt I wasn't posting them regularly enough. I said if you did I'd ban you. Why? Because posting those figures to the girls "on the sly" encourages fixing and fake reviewing. I can't see why you don't notice that!!! In fact you've reviewed Anna during the month of Jan too. Perhaps you were part of this AnnaGate fixing opperation? This just gets worse. I can't believe you, google and Anna are pressing me on this when you all clearly tried to fix this comp. Its discusting!!!

I am sorry things worked out this way. I'm sorry I tried to let Anna down gentley instead of exposing her as a fixer. And I'm sorry I had to tell the board members about your annoying and irresponsible behaviour. You mean well but your a God damn cyber stalker that takes things to obsessive levels. I'm sorry to say that but you are. I supported you and tried to have you included as a MOD. Looking at things now I'm glad the other members didn't support that. I think I've given you, Anna and her reviewers too much benefit of the doubt. I will not in future and that goes for all reviewers. I have no personal beef with Anna, you or any of her reviewers. I am sorry to all the members of E-I about this discussting and disgracefull situation of which my crime was not to expose the lot of you sooner. I actually do think this is my fault for not nipping it in the bud sooner. This could of been handled by PM guys you didn't need to wreck the gaff. Reputations have now been ruined over this. Your reputaions and mine for not calling you all out. You all owe appologies to the good people of this site. The proof is there and you cannot avoid or over look it. So stop the charade.

Ric xxx

Coming soon...Trusted Reviewer Criteria

[El Gordo]

I wasn't planning to discuss pm's, but you've brought the subject up, so I feel I have to respond.

I've sent nine lists of fake reviews, not 15, but your counting seems a bit off lately.

Except for the first two short ones, they were sent to Sarah and to you. You can see that at the top of the message. So if you were too busy you could let Sarah deal with them.

All of these lists were like the three I posted to the boards, i.e. clear cases of copying. I don't know what you mean when you say that some of them do not need ratting. Do you think that if an ip checks out then it doesn't matter that the review is a copy of someone else's review of another escort, sometimes without even bothering to change the escort's name in the text?

You did indeed pm asking me to stop sending you lists of fake reviews, so I did. I was somewhat surprised to see a reviews mod openly say that he didn't want to hear about obvious fakes, but I complied.

I've seen fakes since, but I've kept quiet about it. I did post three lists to the warning section about the repeat offenders Toro, BusyMouse and bryan. The reason I did that is that I thought people should be warned. Toro has 19 reviews on the system. BusyMouse has 13. And I had to post when I did because evidence was disappearing. In some cases the copied review was deleted. In some cases the original review was deleted. I wanted people to see the evidence for themselves, and I couldn't be sure that they would get a chance unless I acted quickly.

But I was very careful in those three posts. I didn't mention that you and Sarah had been informed about a week before and not done anything. I didn't mention the disappearing reviews. There was nothing there which could be considered criticism of either of you.

I never threatened to post competition results before you. As you know, I download all the reviews because I need a copy for generating the list in my blog. It was fairly easy to have the program calculate Escort of the Month standings at the same time, since all the information was already there. I sent you a copy because I thought it would help you. You have complained many times about needing to read through a thousand reviews a month. With this list you wouldn't have to. It would be enough to read through the reviews of the escorts who appear in the standings. And, to make your life even easier, I included links to all those reviews. This was meant to be a help. When I read through your post above, I wondered if perhaps I didn't make myself clear enough in my pm. But I'm looking at it now. I think the title Would something like this be helpful to you? should have alerted you that this was meant as an offer of help. I once also offered, not threatened but offered, to post the list at intervals during the competition, with a clear warning that it was unofficial, since you had stopped posting standings yourself. For this I was threatened with a ban. For offering to post publicly available information if you agreed.


Your statement that you didn't process my review because you hadn't got around to them is simply false. You posted more than a dozen later reviews before reluctantly posting mine. I stated above that you were not planning on posting it, and you were not even planning on telling me that you weren't posting it. I think that's the only reasonable interpretation of your pm to me.

It's not my fault that this is being dealt with openly on the boards instead of by pm. I sent you a pm, and a very polite one, enquiring about how the results were calculated, because I couldn't get the numbers to add up even after taking into account your decision to discount Eoin3's review. I got threatened with a ban, and decided that quiet pm's were probably not going to accomplish anything. Still, I didn't post anything until you started ratting reviews to cover your tracks.

So I think it's clear what has happened here. When you announced Anna as the winner of Miss December, you wrote "I also couldn't find any real dodgy reviews on her profile." It seemed like an odd thing to write in a congratulatory message. You were suspicious of Anna, but without any firm basis. So you tried to find dodgy reviews, and couldn't. This month, when she looked to be the winner again, you employed various tricks to prevent it. Your goal wasn't to make sure Elle won, which you could have done with a tie, but rather to make sure Anna didn't. And now that you've been caught at it, you're trying to slander people to cover it up.

You've said that no other escort has complained about the competition. I'll assume this is true. But does that surprise anyone? You are the reviews mod. You decide whether their reviews go up and whether they get ratted. You are also a boards mod. You decide whether their ads comply with the rules. Of course they don't complain.

I'll now leave it to the other members to decide for themselves who is "not totally trustworthy."

[UKHeather]

I have lots of thoughts on this but I'll keep it simple and state the obvious..

I's clearly a bad idea for a mod involved in running competitions based on reviews.. to also be a reviews mod

[Anna23]

[QUOTE=RicFlair;183527]

Anna its discusting. You talk about your "honesty" all the time. I'm sorry madam but your full of it. The stench of bullshit from your reviews for January was over powering. I'm not going to investigate them more because God knows what will be found.

[/

If this is what the review mod and owner of this comp thinks about me and my reviews, then I’m afraid he is biased.
Ric,You don’t need to be rude to anyone who is asking for a fair competition, do you. It’s not personal.
I’m not asking you for any benefit of doubt, I know I wouldn’t get it on this site. And I don’t need it because i compete obeying the rules, I’m not the one who is changing them during the course of the comp and even after it’s finished.
It is you who cannot backup his arguments and so is looking for more and more excuses for why I couldn’t win. So now can I eventually know the secret reason why XPS reviews are ratted? If there is any reasonable reason...except for its convenience...
As for Google, it is no secret, that he is my long-time regular for almost 2 years now. He saw me so many times, that if he was to remember the exact date of each visit and write a review, it would wreck your head Ric. I don’t think the date is so important in this case, the main thing is, that the content of the review is true and there is no reason to doubt this as it is in accordance with my other reviews. Punters do often put wrong dates and times in reviews, especially if they are repeat customers, like MrJolly in this similar case to mine

Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 019022 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

Everybody here knows, that I’m not that type of person, who would stay quiet when getting a false review, even if its a good one. I have proved this with BLACK CAT, who admitted he never saw me, yet he still has a badge, nevermind a rat.
So if there is something disgusting, then its accusing me of trying to fix this comp and suggesting that my genuine reviews are false.

[BlahBlahBlah]

Hey all,

It seems to be getting a little out of control in here!

I will say what some other punters have said and congrats to Elle its not your fault this discussion is taking place.

Ric, Fair enough its your competition and you put in great effort to run the competition, but no point in putting in the effort if the results are questionned on a regular basis. Without getting into the nitty gritty, which I think is uncalled for on your behalf with your analysis of Annas stats on the boards, it is obvious that the competition is not fair and just. Thats my opinion, for what it is worth. I am not saying I have the solution, I am only adding my opinion to a subject which I thought was unfair on one escort who I am sure works just as hard as the other.

Ok enough babbling from me, I am off to smoke a big Blunt, cos my head is hurting me after reading all them posts, especially El Gordos! ;0)

[El Gordo]

I think I've already explained what I think, and why, but I just wanted to clear up two things.

I've put your name forward for moderation to the board 3 times. And 3 times it was rejected. The Mods find you odd and not totally trustworthy. I didn't realise that until your recent behaviour.

I never asked anyone to propose me for a mod. You mentioned back in April that you were thinking of proposing me, and I tried to talk you out of it. I suggested Carlos instead. I think I was right on that one. Carlos has been, on balance, a much better mod than I would have been. That was the last time we discussed the question.

In fact you've reviewed Anna during the month of Jan too. Perhaps you were part of this AnnaGate fixing opperation?

I don't think there was an AnnaGate fixing operation, except for you fixing the competition so she didn't win. One thing I'm certain of is that I am not part of any conspiracy. I write what I want when I want on both the boards and reviews and I don't take instructions from anyone. If you want to be pissed off at me then go ahead. But it's me you should be pissed off at and no one else. Don't go around punishing other people for my actions.

[Forrest]

I don't know exactly who is right or who is wrong in this argument, Ric or El Gordo, but I will say that the accusation of fixing reviews by Anna is a bit OTT!!! I have met Anna on a couple of occasions and enjoyed myself each time, and I have no doubt that, if Anna adopted the same attitude in all her appointments as she did with me, she would have no need to try to boost her reviews, they would happen automatically from satisfied clients.

Ric, I don't know where you get the time or patience to do what you do, so fair play to you for the great efforts in looking after the competition every month.

El Gordo, I don't know where you get the time to produce so many stats, or why you even go to the trouble of doing so when you don't work for EI, but, once again, fair play to you for doing so as some of your stuff is quite interesting.

[Westsidex]

adults arguing over a fuckin comp on the internet.

that says it all,
Westside.

[westcorklad]

adults arguing over a fuckin comp on the internet.

that says it all,
Westside.

Makes a change from arguing over the Lisbon Treaty and Usain Bolt v Ben Johnson I suppose