Banned Users Reviews

[ber]

I tend to agree 100% with anon here i have gone and read all the reviews ,all the other reviews bar the ratted one are too similar in lenght ,writing style and content for it to be a coincidence also the
ratted review stated it wasnt the girl in the pics. The whole thing smells of agency to me. The reason
that seems to be given for ratting the review was poor english,well to my eyes there are two very
different types of poor english,1 poor english of a person whom english is not their first language
2 poor english of a person whom english is their first language, for me this falls in the 2nd category
so i dont think a punter should be punished for dreaming of escorts rather than studying when in school.Unless new imformation should come to light my opinion as an experienced client reading
those reviews is that no way would i go to see her on the strenght of them. On the balance of
probability i would tend to believe the ratted review before the others.Another thing is where
these reviews were written from is also predominantely agnecy country with very few independents operating from there

[ber]

Concerning the point Kelly made about not many reviewers using the forum what u will find is that
generally on the law of averages if a girl has a few reviews,while it might not be from a reviewer
with a badge or even someone who uses the forums their will be at least one review from someone
we would all recognise as a reasonably well known reviewer