Originally Posted by
anon361
It's a hard one, while I don't agree with one rule for some and another for others, I think it's only where the Banned User hasn't proven themselves to be a genuine person. Take NBT for example, the reason he got banned would have no bearing on his reviews being genuine or not, we know he's a genuine punter so altough he is banned I wouldn't agree with his reviews being removed or ratted!!
Where a person leaves 1 or 2 reviews has no post history and gets banned then yes by all means rat his reviews??