Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Banned Users Reviews

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    16,828
    Reviews
    57

    Default Banned Users Reviews

    I was just looking at this escorts reviews and I was thinking to myself they all look suspicious, not one mentions her pictures or how she looks yet they are marked as not -verified, funny enough after reading them all, the only one that seems plausible is the one that has been ratted.

    Anyway it got me thinking, should this review by a Banned user (fantasist) with no apparent message board history bar 1 post be allowed to stay un-ratted. How can it be considered genuine if he is not?? Obviously there is something about him that has got him banned as his only post is to wish a Happy Crimbo..

    Maybe the mods can explain this one

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    where ever i may roam
    Posts
    4,872
    Reviews
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    I was just looking at this escorts reviews and I was thinking to myself they all look suspicious, not one mentions her pictures or how she looks yet they are marked as not -verified, funny enough after reading them all, the only one that seems plausible is the one that has been ratted.

    Anyway it got me thinking, should this review by a Banned user (fantasist) with no apparent message board history bar 1 post be allowed to stay un-ratted. How can it be considered genuine if he is not?? Obviously there is something about him that has got him banned as his only post is to wish a Happy Crimbo..

    Maybe the mods can explain this one
    i think all banned users should have there trusted reviewer badge removed or better again there reviews should be all deleted and that includes all there posts if they broke the rules and got banned for good why should there history of reviews remain what ya think?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    16,828
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirty Harry View Post
    i think all banned users should have there trusted reviewer badge removed or better again there reviews should be all deleted and that includes all there posts if they broke the rules and got banned for good why should there history of reviews remain what ya think?
    It's a hard one, while I don't agree with one rule for some and another for others, I think it's only where the Banned User hasn't proven themselves to be a genuine person. Take NBT for example, the reason he got banned would have no bearing on his reviews being genuine or not, we know he's a genuine punter so altough he is banned I wouldn't agree with his reviews being removed or ratted!!
    Where a person leaves 1 or 2 reviews has no post history and gets banned then yes by all means rat his reviews??

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    I was just looking at this escorts reviews and I was thinking to myself they all look suspicious, not one mentions her pictures or how she looks yet they are marked as not -verified, funny enough after reading them all, the only one that seems plausible is the one that has been ratted.

    Anyway it got me thinking, should this review by a Banned user (fantasist) with no apparent message board history bar 1 post be allowed to stay un-ratted. How can it be considered genuine if he is not?? Obviously there is something about him that has got him banned as his only post is to wish a Happy Crimbo..

    Maybe the mods can explain this one
    I just checked and fantasist was banned for requesting bareback in client request section or to be exact requesting AWO on the 26.12.09.

    The conclusion we arrived at is that banned users should not have reviews deleted except in exceptional circumstances and in fact something that will have to be done at some point is to re activate reviews that were deleted by the previous reviews administration as at the moment we have the situation that reviews were deleted by someone who himself is banned but his reviews are not deleted. So it needs to be one rule for all banned users.

    Banned users with badges is a whole different ball game.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    14,557
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default I dont think that they should

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirty Harry View Post
    i think all banned users should have there trusted reviewer badge removed or better again there reviews should be all deleted and that includes all there posts if they broke the rules and got banned for good why should there history of reviews remain what ya think?
    have their reviews removed because its the girls earned those reviews. I see no reason why a girl who earned a few reviews should all of a sudden loose them because of something not within her control.As for the trusted reviewers badge goes i think that they should be left with banned users too for the simple reason that again its others loose out,not the banned user.

    Westside.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    14,557
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default One thing though that i think should be done

    is if a someone leaves a very vile ,nasty text in a review.In this case i think not only should the review be deleted but the review treated like if it were on the message boards and the username banned.

    Westside.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    16,828
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyCurvybabe View Post
    why???

    i would say it depends on why he was banned

    just because hes banned does not mean hes fake.

    i also dont see why your calling for all her reviews to be ratted abecause they havnt posted on the forum

    not everyone likes to post on the forum
    that does not make them fake
    Hi Kelly,

    Firstly I was not calling for all her reviews to be ratted, stating my opinion does not constitute me calling for her reviews to be ratted, I wish i carried that kind of clout on this site LOL

    As for the banned user issue, I asked a question as to whether or not they should be ratted and I left it open for discussion, after all this is a forum for discussion isn't it I asked why he was banned and that would also tie in with your comment on "i would say it depends on why he was banned"

    I will say I think 1 time reviewers who's profiles have been banned should be ratted no matter what the reason. In the case of this escort I will also state that I consider her reviews to be suspect. These are my opinions which I think I am entitled to but I have no influence over these matters and the people that do I'm sure are well able to come up with their own opinions..

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    16,828
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Let’s start again, there is no need to be sorry as you were only sating your opinion and your cause is a noble one, but while I would be a champion for any lady, I will also point out discrepancies where I see them and I would be the first to apologies if I am wrong.

    That said, would you not think it better to uncover all fake reviews so that in the end it would be better for us all both escort and client.
    To do this certain ladies reviews would be brought into question or debated upon, this does not mean they are fake but by discussion as a community we could arrive at a satisfactory answer?

    Oh. and I apologise if I was a bit snappy xx

  9. #9

    Default

    as i do not post reviews on this site, my comments can be listened to or not.

    If somebody writes a review to deliberately hurt an escort ,or shows no respect to escorts on forum , their reviews should be deleted if both above offences are linked are cause for banning.

    On the reviews mentioned at the start of this thread , i do not think that dire english is a good enough reason for a doubt being cast on a review . After all we are a multi cultural nation now.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    cork the real capital
    Posts
    5,553
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    83

    Default Agree

    I tend to agree 100% with anon here i have gone and read all the reviews ,all the other reviews bar the ratted one are too similar in lenght ,writing style and content for it to be a coincidence also the
    ratted review stated it wasnt the girl in the pics. The whole thing smells of agency to me. The reason
    that seems to be given for ratting the review was poor english,well to my eyes there are two very
    different types of poor english,1 poor english of a person whom english is not their first language
    2 poor english of a person whom english is their first language, for me this falls in the 2nd category
    so i dont think a punter should be punished for dreaming of escorts rather than studying when in school.Unless new imformation should come to light my opinion as an experienced client reading
    those reviews is that no way would i go to see her on the strenght of them. On the balance of
    probability i would tend to believe the ratted review before the others.Another thing is where
    these reviews were written from is also predominantely agnecy country with very few independents operating from there
    Blatant promotion should be outlawed
    but
    Vincent Browne is a Hero

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •