Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Review idea suggestions

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    427
    Reviews
    8

    Thumbs up Review idea suggestions

    ello

    My 3 suggestions for improving reviews which I think
    can be done quickly

    1: New symbol
    Reason
    Two many fraudelent reviews are not flagged or only
    flagged by a comment in review
    A new symbol in addition to rat symbol ,QUESTION MARK,
    i.e.
    RAT symbol for known or highly likely fraud
    Question mark for suspected fraud or new reviewer
    for example Look at Scarlets in cork last review by peeler
    Its ovbious fraud although you can't prove it.
    Should have a question mark symbol against it.

    2: Increase colour code
    reason
    The current system of just postive and negative is too restrictiie


    rating......................... current ................new
    Very sastfied.................. green ................ green
    Fairly Satisfied................. green ............... blue
    n/a ................................ grey ................ grey
    Fairly dis-Satisfied ..........red ...................yellow
    Very dis-sastfied...............red ................ red

    3: Establsied reviewers 3 levels of badge
    Gold = 50 posts 75 reviews
    Sliver= 25 posts 50 reviews
    Bronze = 15 posts 25 reviews
    Reviewer to be checked somehow before badge issued
    trusted reviewer is changed to established reviwer

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    In this thread
    Posts
    21,745
    Reviews
    102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whiteknight111 View Post
    ello

    for example Look at Scarlets in cork last review by peeler
    Its ovbious fraud although you can't prove it.
    Should have a question mark symbol against it.
    I dont see anything fraudulent about this review. Explain yourself.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Dublin Fair City
    Posts
    8,660
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Thanks for the suggestions.

    I would be interested in what others thing.

    My concern would be making things more complex like you suggest would actually just make things more complicated and hard to underatand for the average user?

    Pat x

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    619
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    It is a imperfect system, but on balance to keep eveyone happy it is not the worst. The one thing I believe needs to be changed is the N/A symbol used for when an escort does not keep an appointment or for when you get there and she has hairy arms and a beard and you turn tail and run. To me these rate highly the on worst things an escort can do list. I know what you are thinking u have had no service so you cannot review. Well I think from the moment you phone and agree to make an appointment the service has begun(like any other contract). If you get there and complete your business and do not like it it is your opinion, one mans meat and all that, but if you make an appointment and the escort breaks it, well thats real. I have travelled along way on occasion and had no shows costing me money and a lot of frustration.

    There I said it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    427
    Reviews
    8

    Default explain

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    I dont see anything fraudulent about this review. Explain yourself.
    I am not picking on scarlet or peeler here, there are thousands of dodgy reviews I could have picked
    The reason this review is dodgy is he/she is a first time reviewer, registered that day, gave a ambsolutly glowing review, has never posted etc etc, it smells, the moderator left a comment at end

    Reviews like this should either be ratted or else flagged some other way e.g. Question mark symbol

    Rat symbol = Known Fraud or highly suspected fraud
    Question Mark symbol = Suspected fraud or diodgy looking

    Lets watch peeler over next couple of months and see if he/she is real


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Dublin Fair City
    Posts
    8,660
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by poggo View Post
    It is a imperfect system, but on balance to keep eveyone happy it is not the worst. The one thing I believe needs to be changed is the N/A symbol used for when an escort does not keep an appointment or for when you get there and she has hairy arms and a beard and you turn tail and run. To me these rate highly the on worst things an escort can do list. I know what you are thinking u have had no service so you cannot review. Well I think from the moment you phone and agree to make an appointment the service has begun(like any other contract). If you get there and complete your business and do not like it it is your opinion, one mans meat and all that, but if you make an appointment and the escort breaks it, well thats real. I have travelled along way on occasion and had no shows costing me money and a lot of frustration.

    There I said it.
    Yes clients have their time wasted sometimes, but so do escorts. In fact I suspect escorts have their time wasted a lot more than clients do.

    The current situation is that clients can leave a review when they have their time wasted saying how and why the escort wasted their time, but "N/A" comes up rather than a negative or positive symbol, as those symbol are based on questions you are not asked when filling out a review form if you say you didn't get as far as completing the booking.

    I think a lot of escorts would consider it very unfair if clients who hadn't actually completed a booking with them could leave a negative mark on their reviews list, rather than the "N/A" that is currently there. And I tend to agree that I think it probably would be unfair.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    In this thread
    Posts
    21,745
    Reviews
    102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whiteknight111 View Post
    I am not picking on scarlet or peeler here, there are thousands of dodgy reviews I could have picked
    The reason this review is dodgy is he/she is a first time reviewer, registered that day, gave a ambsolutly glowing review, has never posted etc etc, it smells, the moderator left a comment at end

    Reviews like this should either be ratted or else flagged some other way e.g. Question mark symbol

    Rat symbol = Known Fraud or highly suspected fraud
    Question Mark symbol = Suspected fraud or diodgy looking

    Lets watch peeler over next couple of months and see if he/she is real

    Still can’t see why you find this review "Dodgy". You may notice from my reviews that I had a similar experience with Scarlet, and knowing the girl well I can believe his review. Are you suggesting that SCARLET requires to collude with a punter in order to get a good review, Huh, SCARLET, I think not. What are you suggesting that all first time reviewers should tone it down a bit? Remember a first time reviewer may be a novice to the game and can get a little bit excited after his encounter. I was there once and I’m sure you were. As you have mentioned the Mods response - I never really understand the requirement for this *** first review*** thing. Isn’t it blatantly obvious that this is his first review? It is also blatantly obvious when he joined?, its stated there on the page.

    Whitenight - Having examined your new proposals for the review system I think that they are unnecessary. Color coded messages are not what’s needed. In my opinion I feel the Trusted Reviewer system actually does work. But we have to be able to trust the “trusted reviewers”. If I was staff I would list each current trustee, and examine his profile and history within some kind of forum and guarantee his trustee status. Once the general punter public can be more assured that these are trusted reviewers now we have a working system. A potential trustee should have at least 10 reviews. Posts to the Community Site should not be as important. There are a lot of goods reviewers out there that I would trust, that do not have a badge. It’s not too hard to work out who is legit and who is a waster. I think the current results in your poll reflect that this is what’s needed Patricia.

  8. #8

    Default

    badges for "trusted reviewers" what does that mean, they have more reviews than anyone else of women who cant read or speak english so cant complain. some reviews are barely in english, others are macho nonsense, im so bis, she moaned, i came 50 times. seriously the review concept is helpful, escorts who do not participate hurt themselves, very often they are a moving feast, substitutes added by agencies, my own particular gripe is a review of mme avenante who i have on ly ever mer once, only an illiterate would regard that as a n/a, let me be clear i had a wonderful time with her, it matters to her not to me, so that should be changed, so sort it out, she deserves that, you have award winners, for what exactly? this is an information forum not a back slapping one.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Under Patricia.........
    Posts
    8,423
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Illiterate???

    Quote Originally Posted by zicooo View Post
    my own particular gripe is a review of mme avenante who i have on ly ever mer once, only an illiterate would regard that as a n/a, let me be clear i had a wonderful time with her, it matters to her not to me, so that should be changed, so sort it out, she deserves that, you have award winners, for what exactly? this is an information forum not a back slapping one.
    Hmmm.............

    The reason the review you left for Mademoiselle Avenante is marked n/a is because under the options for "Booking Outcome" you selected the option "Met with escort, but left without receiving service" so I suppose that would make you the illiterate............

    No awards for you today...............

    Sort it out eh Zicooo.....................
    Advertising space available for hire, and reviews for sale, just call me....xxx

    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  10. Exclamation review system

    this is my first time postin. My opinion is that the review system at the moment is really f*** up. You get the rat way to fast or sometimes when some ppl should they don't. I have 2 reviews of the same girl and the 2nd review has a rat next to it why it doesn't say. I am a real punter so what is the explication for it. Or i did notice 1 really strange thing with 1 escort reviews. For a long time she only had a few and in the last 2months she started gettin atleast 1 review dayly if not 2 and 3. Now what are the chances in a bad economy that she has so many review writtgn punters dayly... Come on!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •