Banned User
Certified E-I Addict
He saw the opportunity and he took it. It's within the bounds of refereeing/linesman error.
I think that only if it's something dangerous or offensive should there be a possible sanction afterwards.
What we should be complaining about now is the ridiculous "top seeded team gets to play home first" rule for the next playoffs, which is clear moving of the goalposts.
Last edited by Doozer; 18-01-10 at 20:34.
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
He offended the Irish nation, does that count?Originally Posted by nicegirlsarenice
Whatever about the home and away legs for the seeded players its the fact that if we qualified we would have moved up in the seedings orselves and (hopefully) got a worse extra team than us in the group
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
If the ref didn't see it, it's fair game. That's football, suckers!
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
If he was punished now it would be an embarrassment for FIFA. They would have to replay the match or re-instate us instead of France.
Help Keyla in her fight with cancer. Every little helps.
It could happen to any of us.
https://gofund.me/8e340537
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
As much as I would love that, It was never going to happen, but a match ban would have been enough, at least someway fair, instead of saying that he did nothing wrong and as long as the ref doesnt see it its legal
its a joke that he got away scott free...should have been minimum 3 match ban,but i hope France looses every match at the world cup,now whats the odds for that??
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
Henry gets off
Not sure why, but when I sat the title of this thread, this is what I thought it was about..........
Hospital builder | Man sacked after having sex with a Henry the hoover | The Sun |News
Sorry...................
Ok, back on topic now...........
"It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
L
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
