The 'oh poor me' slant once again.
What is wrong with the people that write this bollocks ?
Grrrr
T
xxx
They prefer to write articles that make the readers disgusted. It is better to talk about the down side of the business. All businesses have its own.
The press won't show the other side, educated girls that have escorting as a choice of work or successful men that could be having sex with many women but for their choice of not getting attached to someone they prefer to pay for companionship.
It is the same everywhere and is not going to change. Most people have a completely wrong idea about what really happens and articles like this help people keeping the prejudice.
************NO LONGER PROVIDING ESCORT SERVICE**********************
At the address at the bottom of the article.
As long as crap like this gets published we will still continue to be seen as societies 'bottom feeders'
Women reporters always seem to be more scathing about this subject than male, why is that ? Do we threaten their cosy little worlds do you think ?
T
xxx
They hace nothing better to write about. Saw a piece in the Sunday World yesterday where they stated that escorts were earnibg at least 300 per half hour during the boom years.
I visit escorts because there is no attachments. I pay my money hopefully leave happy and the escort is happy with my money in her pocket.
[I AM SUCH A BASTARD I HAVE EXPLOITED THE LADY?]
why i read The Dandy and Viz.
Way better reading,
Westside.
More of a Beano man myself