Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Q? on reviews totals.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,546
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    the review of Anna is the second one and is noted as such at the bottom by whoever was checking them.
    I have a question about this. The note just says "2nd review". That makes it sound like it was your second review ever, not just your second review of Anna. After all, "First review" always means no previous reviews, not no previous reviews of this escort. And I'm pretty sure that "2nd review" has been used on other reviews to mean that the reviewer has only one previous review, although such notes seem to be quite rare. So I think the note is confusing.

    The point is an important one, because most people would interpret "second review ever" as a bad sign while "second review of this escort" would normally be a good sign.

    I would suggest the following:
    - Reviews with notes that say just "second review" are confusing and should have their notes changed to make it clearer what was meant. There aren't many of these. Less than 20, I think. I can send a list to a reviews mod if needed. Pm me if interested.
    - Second, or subsequent, reviews of the same escort should have a more detailed note, like "This reviewer has reviewed this escort before. E-I policy is to list only the most recent review." For anyone who types slow, you can just bookmark this post and copy and paste.
    - Reviewers' second reviews should not be marked. There's nothing particularly suspicious about having only two reviews. Even if they're both written on the day the reviewer registered. Someone may decide to register in order to review an escort he's seen recently, and may decide that he might as well review an escort he's seen earlier while he's at it. That's in fact what I did, with Eve and Agatha, if I remember correctly. Besides, we can all see the reviewer's number of reviews, his registration date and the date of the review at the top of the page, so a note wouldn't give anyone any new information.

    “I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
    “All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,059
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by El Gordo View Post
    I have a question about this. The note just says "2nd review". That makes it sound like it was your second review ever, not just your second review of Anna. After all, "First review" always means no previous reviews, not no previous reviews of this escort. And I'm pretty sure that "2nd review" has been used on other reviews to mean that the reviewer has only one previous review, although such notes seem to be quite rare. So I think the note is confusing.

    The point is an important one, because most people would interpret "second review ever" as a bad sign while "second review of this escort" would normally be a good sign.

    I would suggest the following:
    - Reviews with notes that say just "second review" are confusing and should have their notes changed to make it clearer what was meant. There aren't many of these. Less than 20, I think. I can send a list to a reviews mod if needed. Pm me if interested.
    - Second, or subsequent, reviews of the same escort should have a more detailed note, like "This reviewer has reviewed this escort before. E-I policy is to list only the most recent review." For anyone who types slow, you can just bookmark this post and copy and paste.
    - Reviewers' second reviews should not be marked. There's nothing particularly suspicious about having only two reviews. Even if they're both written on the day the reviewer registered. Someone may decide to register in order to review an escort he's seen recently, and may decide that he might as well review an escort he's seen earlier while he's at it. That's in fact what I did, with Eve and Agatha, if I remember correctly. Besides, we can all see the reviewer's number of reviews, his registration date and the date of the review at the top of the page, so a note wouldn't give anyone any new information.
    Someone being very picky here
    'First review' states for -first review ever by user.
    'second review' states for- this is 2nd review for this escort by same user

    Fair enought, we will try to update more clear feedback on review but "This reviewer has reviewed this escort before. E-I policy is to list only the most recent review." sounds toooo long for me
    Sarah

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,707

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarah View Post
    Someone being very picky here
    'First review' states for -first review ever by user.
    'second review' states for- this is 2nd review for this escort by same user

    Fair enought, we will try to update more clear feedback on review but "This reviewer has reviewed this escort before. E-I policy is to list only the most recent review." sounds toooo long for me
    Sarah
    And what about this Sarah?
    Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 019034 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies
    I think someone has been picky here...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,059
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anna23 View Post

    What left 2 reviews for you. After checking them now , they were exactly the same. So , it was a simple mistake, Anna
    Thx

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,707

    Red face

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarah View Post
    What left 2 reviews for you. After checking them now , they were exactly the same. So , it was a simple mistake, Anna
    Thx
    I wouldnt call it a mistake. Its more like the well known situation, where reviews dont appear even after said 24hrs and then some people submit them again.
    I hope this will be fixed some day.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,059
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anna23 View Post
    I wouldnt call it a mistake. Its more like the well known situation, where reviews dont appear even after said 24hrs and then some people submit them again.
    I hope this will be fixed some day.
    You can trust whatever you like Anna. Note under your review has nothing to do with technical issues. I hope this can be fixed one day, too.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,059
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mr.britvic View Post
    JUST A QUICK ONE FOR YOU SARAH-
    I LEFT A REVIEW OF SEXY BRIDGETTE IN CORK THIS WEEK...A GOOD REVIEW
    UNDER NEATH IT" 2ND REVIEW OF THIS ESCORT"
    WHEN IN FACT IM SURE ITS MY 5TH OR 6 TH TIME WITH HER....
    AND EACH TIME I LEFT A REVIEW.
    I JUST WANT TO KNOW SINCE SO MANY REVIEWS ARE NOT ALLOWED ON HER REVIEW PAGE,
    IS SOMEBODY SOME WHERE KEEPING TRACK OF ALL MY REVIEWS, EVEN THE ONES
    THAT YOU HAVE DELETED?
    JUST WONDERING?
    After new rule of having one review per escort per client was announced, many reviews been deleted.
    Since then we still keep doing so but many does not mean all of them.
    There was many reports since then about reviews which eventualy been deleted.
    many reviews been removed without showing records of was is 1st, 4th or 9th review.

    Fo the answer, I belive your account been simply cleared up of multiplate reviews. Now you have 1 review for one lady, any new review which is coming up will be taken as '2nd review' which as you pointing correctly out may not be a correct information.

    Sorry guys but this all thing was not planned properly, setting up new rules should be planned more precisely but in this case was not good enouth and noone forseeble these problems. This is why we need to deal with this today.

    I am considering now replacing '2nd review' by 'another review' or smething simmilar. Unless we put a number down there information for many people will not be sufficeint but we can not search all system again to make sure number is correct. I think we should more focus on giving more feedback on the review (if possible).

    Thx

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,546
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    26

    Default

    It was review number 11312, from 26/07/09. I can see why you liked it:
    just to say i seen Kelly about a month ago in dublin and not in belfast and not sure of the date.. i decided to write a review because the time i spent with this lady was great that i had to let other lads know that this girl excellent.it was her first visit to dublin and i had seen her ad on another website and thought to myself that i had to see them tits for myself.Kelly is well worth a visit and is very dirty minded and dont thinl much would shock her and by does she enjoy what she does.her oral skills are out of this world and she nearly had me coming and as for the sex , this girl basically fucked my brains out. i was just about able for her. we even managed to snap the bed in the hotel.Kelly does everything on her profile and more. if you are looking for an excellent time then i can highly reccomend and hour or 2with a gorgeous lady with really massive tits( they are that big) and she is young. I myself hopefully am going to book an over nighter with her in dublin next week and cant wait. she even suggested last time that i wont be getting to much sleep if i do stay all night.

    “I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
    “All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •