So it would seem that 60% of the voters at this point don't actually trust the trusted reviewer and to the ones that do I don't understand your logic, just because he has visited you and might I add gievn you a positive review which you don't want tarnished (either would I) it does not change the fact that he was found out to have submitted at least 2 other false reviews which is fact not speculation, how can you say you don't have any doubts that he hasn't submitted other false reviews and still feel he can be trusted