Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Whats with the ****** ** in reviews?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,952

    Default

    that review was originally written about me

    The **'s are put in place when lady chooses not to have explicit reviews written about her. I take this option.

    I didnt realise that they would be explicit anyway and be ***ed out.. i thought the guys would just write them in a more gentlemanly way!

    I added a rebuttal to that review because it was fake...
    ..only for the author to contact admin and say he wrote it aabout someone else and put my name in by mistake!?!?!?

    You really have to wonder about some people..

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UKHeather View Post
    that review was originally written about me

    The **'s are put in place when lady chooses not to have explicit reviews written about her. I take this option.

    I didnt realise that they would be explicit anyway and be ***ed out.. i thought the guys would just write them in a more gentlemanly way!

    I added a rebuttal to that review because it was fake...
    ..only for the author to contact admin and say he wrote it aabout someone else and put my name in by mistake!?!?!?

    You really have to wonder about some people..
    It wasn't one of yours but that may explain it.
    But looking at it again I'm guessing 'GFE' has been starred and 'GFE extra' may be the other bit??

    How the hell is GFE explicit ???? For ****'s sake ??

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,952

    Default

    It was one of mine until he contacted admin to have it changed to a different lady's name. If I hadnt written a reply to it... it may have been left under my name. It's been sitting as a neg review for me until this evening. Maybe a simple mistake on his part.. but not great for me.
    One of the *** was gfe yes... not explicit I agree.
    The other was cim being extra and i can't remember what the bit with the 888's was, sorry..
    It must have been edited manually as it read differently, earlier.

    Just remembered, the ***888 was poor service

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •