Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: What should be Done to ones like This ? >>

  1. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rooney2808 View Post
    I don't think that's really a thing is it??
    Sure I've heard of the term but I haven't seen the term being used in a context where these people "are advocated for to be accepted."
    It is .

    I believe the idea and term originated in US , coined perhaps by same Uni professor who lectured on it .

    It IS a ‘thing’ — Google x

    : dedicated websites etc.


    / last time I looked into it was 2022 ( ? )
    I do what I want. I cannot do otherwise.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    18,348

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rooney2808 View Post
    It was 6 years and 8 months but yeah still seems too lenient.
    Sorry, today I am wearing glasses, no more mistakes.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    2,514

    Default

    I think the trouble with this that you need a term to refer people who haven’t committed any crime yet and their thoughts are confined to their head, as a medical professional, you don’t go around spray canning paedo on some guys wall. But I do think the term should be protected. This guy isn’t a MAP (or shouldn’t be referred to as one), he’s a child sex offender and attempted child rapist. (If he hasn’t raped a child already…was he caught his first time out? Hard to believe.) The term is probably wrong, I don’t know what you’d call people who are attracted to minors, have never offended and are or could be seeking help. Does trying to prevent offences actually cause less offences, I don’t know.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to IrishSarahBarra For This Useful Post:

    Escort AdvertiserDieve (26-10-23), Marko1980 (26-10-23), Palatine (26-10-23)

  5. #24

    Default

    Big whiff of the Daily Mail Fox GB News Won't Somebody Think of the Children EU Bendy Bananas Brussels Elite Democrats in Paedo Pizza Huts about it.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Palatine For This Useful Post:

    Marko1980 (26-10-23)

  7. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IrishSarahBarra View Post
    I think the trouble with this that you need a term to refer people who haven’t committed any crime yet and their thoughts are confined to their head, as a medical professional, you don’t go around spray canning paedo on some guys wall. But I do think the term should be protected. This guy isn’t a MAP (or shouldn’t be referred to as one), he’s a child sex offender and attempted child rapist. (If he hasn’t raped a child already…was he caught his first time out? Hard to believe.) The term is probably wrong, I don’t know what you’d call people who are attracted to minors, have never offended and are or could be seeking help. Does trying to prevent offences actually cause less offences, I don’t know.

    I just had a brilliant orgasm . Don’t want to ruin my mind atm w this subject , but would like to add to it later x

    For now ::

    Pop ::: ‘minor-attracted person website’ ::: into Google - brings up a page of references to the subject xx

    Lots of reading x


    Good points you have Sarah , I will would like to get back to it x
    I do what I want. I cannot do otherwise.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Stephanie For This Useful Post:

    IrishSarahBarra (26-10-23)

  9. #26
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    432
    Reviews
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Palatine View Post
    Big whiff of the Daily Mail Fox GB News Won't Somebody Think of the Children EU Bendy Bananas Brussels Elite Democrats in Paedo Pizza Huts about it.
    Youve nailed it in one.
    Stephanie shared a link to this before and i looked it up.
    Some Uni professor wrote a paper on using a term like MAP to refer to people who havent abused anyone so they might come forward and get help, like Sarah was saying. The goal being preventing child sex abuse.

    The paper is obviously highly controversial and problematic and as you can imagine not popular.

    The professor is trans so Tucker and the boys got their hands on it and it turned into LGBT and the lefty libtards want to recruit the paedos.

    More ammo for the culture war and hyping up the outrage I reckon.
    It makes perfect Iona got column inches out of it.

    Stephanie is right that theres people advocating for this but googling the term has the usual suspects amplifying it.
    Last edited by Marko1980; 26-10-23 at 18:41.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Marko1980 For This Useful Post:

    Palatine (26-10-23)

  11. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marko1980 View Post
    Youve nailed it in one.
    Stephanie shared a link to this before and i looked it up.
    Some Uni professor wrote a paper on using a term like MAP to refer to people who havent abused anyone so they might come forward and get help, like Sarah was saying. The goal being preventing child sex abuse.

    The paper is obviously highly controversial and problematic and as you can imagine not popular.

    The professor is trans so Tucker and the boys got their hands on it and it turned into LGBT and the lefty libtards want to recruit the paedos.

    More ammo for the culture war and hyping up the outrage I reckon.
    It makes perfect Iona got column inches out of it.

    Stephanie is right that theres people advocating for this but googling the term has the usual suspects amplifying it.
    There's been a pattern amplified by social media in recent years where folks like the Iona "Institute" have struggled to argue against things like gay marriage (doesn't hurt anyone) and their approach has been to use the slippery slope logical fallacy. "If you allow two gays to marry then soon people will be marrying their dogs next/children will be deprived of mothers". "If you allow a man to identify as a woman then why not allow them to identify as a butterfly".

    These kinds of stories are almost always the right misrepresenting the truth or amplifying the crazy wing of the left. Then the left goes into convolutions arguing about things that really generally don't matter and average joe goes and votes for Trump because the guy looks positively sane and stable compared to these "woke mobs".

    Throw in the EU commission and the Daily Mail readers are positively jerking off in their bedpans as the NHS goes to shit around them.
    Last edited by Palatine; 26-10-23 at 19:30.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Palatine For This Useful Post:

    Marko1980 (26-10-23)

  13. #28
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    432
    Reviews
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Palatine View Post
    There's been a pattern amplified by social media in recent years where folks like the Iona "Institute" have struggled to argue against things like gay marriage (doesn't hurt anyone) and their approach has been to use the slippery slope logical fallacy. "If you allow two gays to marry then soon people will be marrying their dogs next/children will be deprived of mothers". "If you allow a man to identify as a woman then why not allow them to identify as a butterfly".

    These kinds of stories are almost always the right misrepresenting the truth or amplifying the crazy wing of the left. Then the left goes into convolutions arguing about things that really generally don't matter and average joe goes and votes for Trump because the guy looks positively sane and stable compared to these "woke mobs".

    Throw in the EU commission and the Daily Mail readers are positively jerking off in their bedpans as the NHS goes to shit around them.
    Its not the same as this one really but does remind me of those yarns about the student who identifies as a cat who requires a litter tray in school that every right winger fell for.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    6,459
    Reviews
    116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rachel Divine View Post
    Just read the title only, not the article. I see Putin will put on chemical treatment all these kind of people and I absolutely agree with it.

    8 months is a joke - should be 80 years in jail - no way out whatsoever.
    That little Russian dictator deals with lots of people with chemicals, political rivals, business competitors etc etc ....
    We have two lives , the second begins when we realise we only have one .....

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Mrbean76 For This Useful Post:

    Palatine (27-10-23)

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •