Are you serious? Okay, you asked for it.
The article states "When a junior employee at Television Centre complained to her supervisor in the late 1980s that she had been sexually assaulted by Savile, she was told "keep your mouth shut, he is a VIP", the report found." and "Director general Lord Hall said the BBC had failed to protect the victims."
The first link links directly to a report, the Dame Janet Smith review. Chapter 2 deals with the history, ethos and management culture of the BBC. Management were not aware because management did not encourage reporting or complaints made by staff and that departments did not communicate laterally and in some cases did not communicate with the executive! The terms "baronies" and "fiefdoms" are used. So, how could management be made aware if there was no way to make them aware? And does the term "BBC" refer to the executive, staff generally, the assets or some abstract institution? Does a production manager on Jim'll Fix It count as BBC management?
There were no reports made by the media during Saville's regular presenting career from 1964- 1994; his last appearance as a co-presenter was in 2006, he died in 2011 and the media began reporting about the rapes and abuse in 2012. How am I supposed to supply evidence of something from before 2012 which wasn't reported publicly until 2012? I provided a link to the timeline of what the MET police knew, they have a report about Saville from 1960, detailing the abuse a boy suffered at his hands. The police had a written report about Saville in 1960. 4 years before he would embark on his peak period at the BBC.
Read this and tell me what you think.
https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...43#post3706743
Keep up son!