New Signature Rules

[MissX]

But it is catch 22. If we only listen to paying customers, clients are not happy, then they go elsewhere, then the escorts are not as busy. We have to keep both sides happy.

BTW: Sinead, I agree that your sig in quite neat despite not falling into new rules. But don't you think we should have some rules, even if you don't think the new ones are too strict as some signatures are OTT?

This board is not posted on by the majority of clients, Patricia, i have recently opted out of the review system and if i listened to what has been posted here, by 'clients'?? i should have been out of business by now!

The majority of 'clients' jump on here have a quick look around and go . . .

as an escort, who values her business, i would like to be able to forward my information, as efficiently as possible to the same people who get on here in the shortest time possible . . . .

So if it saves them from having to click my newly installed 'profile button'
it saves on the time needed to upload my profile page as they already have
the information they would have had to 'look' for . . .without 'looking'


xx


overall Patricia
'you're the business' fair play . . . .

xxx

Sinead

[nicegirlsarenice]

MissX, you said yourself you disagreed with Anna23's sig and said there should be limits. Now you're disagreeing with what Patricia is saying? She said practically the same thing. If the majority of clients don't come here then it doesn't matter one way or the other.

Just for the record: I am a client and I have never claimed to see Anna23.

I thought you could post ads and have sigs anyway without advertising, maybe that was changed recently or something. Or maybe what I heard was for people who had temporarily had their profiles down but had paid previously and their sigs/ads were let up.

[luther]

everyone comes under the same rule

which in this case is unfair . . . . .


x

Sinead

If everyone is under the same rule???

[MissX]

MissX, you said yourself you disagreed with Anna23's sig and said there should be limits. Now you're disagreeing with what Patricia is saying? She said practically the same thing. If the majority of clients don't come here then it doesn't matter one way or the other.

Just for the record: I am a client and I have never claimed to see Anna23.

I thought you could post ads and have sigs anyway without advertising, maybe that was changed recently or something. Or maybe what I heard was for people who had temporarily had their profiles down but had paid previously and their sigs/ads were let up.

I just want to say that you are an. . . . . .

I also want to say this,
so much goes on the board here about 'reviews' etc etc
wouldn't see a girl who opted out blah blah blah bullshit etc.


Do you really understand the hypocrisy of it all . . .

Anna23 is ESCORT OF THE MONTH

on her signature are quotes from clients reviews of her
If it is SO IMPORTANT that escorts should have reviews

shouldn't they also be 'PROUD' to advertise and be acknowledged
for the same????????

Instead of getting hassled just for displaying the 'trophies' deserved?


It is so f***** up here at the moment,

i think you should 'think' before you post!

nitey nite

xx

Sinead

[luther]

**********

But since punters are not in competition with the escorts what difference does that make???

We're talking about a level playing field for advertising escorts..............

[MissX]

MissX, you said yourself you disagreed with Anna23's sig and said there should be limits. Now you're disagreeing with what Patricia is saying? She said practically the same thing. If the majority of clients don't come here then it doesn't matter one way or the other.

Just for the record: I am a client and I have never claimed to see Anna23.

I thought you could post ads and have sigs anyway without advertising, maybe that was changed recently or something. Or maybe what I heard was for people who had temporarily had their profiles down but had paid previously and their sigs/ads were let up.

I just want to say that you are an. . . . . .

I also want to say this,
so much goes on the board here about 'reviews' etc etc
wouldn't see a girl who opted out blah blah blah bullshit etc.


Do you really understand the hypocrisy of it all . . .

Anna23 is ESCORT OF THE MONTH

on her signature are quotes from clients reviews of her
If it is SO IMPORTANT that escorts should have reviews

shouldn't they also be 'PROUD' to advertise and be acknowledged
for the same????????

Instead of getting hassled just for displaying the 'trophies' deserved?


It is so f***** up here at the moment,

i think you should 'think' before you post!

nitey nite

xx

Sinead

The majority of clients do 'come here' they just don't POST here.
That's my point, they look gauge as mch info possible and go!

G.A.L.

Nice

xx

Sinead

[Anna23]

Does anybody else realize how silly ridiculous and useless all this discussing is? Or are there guys who take this seriously?
Now I really didn't have anything better to do these days, so sorry if I have offended anyone with my opinions. It's just that i needed to waste a certain amount of time...

Merry Christmas everyone!

Just couldnt help to use a bit of color, as long as it is still allowed

[MissX]

But since punters are not in competition with the escorts what difference does that make???

We're talking about a level playing field for advertising escorts..............

It is a level playing field already,

Isn't it up to the individual to portray themselves
through their signature

to have themselves 'stand out' from the rest?

If escorts take the time and interest to do this
in whatever fashion they choose

How on earth is it NOT a level playing field?


I will adjust my signature, to meet the new rule requirement

but in opinion, it's a waste of time

It will still contain the information, i already have in my now
unacceptable signature

I am sure the other 'offending' signatures will still 'stand out'
from the ones that don't.

ONLY BECAUSE (as self-employed escorts)
WE TAKE THE TIME AND EFFORT TO WORD
OUR SIGNATURES WITH WORTHWHILE 'QUICK' INFORMATION

(tour dates, areas covered, numbers quick-pics, reviews etc)

xx

Sinead

[luther]

I will adjust my signature, to meet the new rule requirement

but in opinion, it's a waste of time

It will still contain the information, i already have in my now
unacceptable signature

What's the problem then???

[MissX]

What's the problem then???

It is a level playing field already,

in my opinion, it's a waste of time

I am sure the other 'offending' signatures will still 'stand out'
from the ones that don't.

THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH SIGNATURES
In my opinion
It was a level playing ground
and as i've already said
THERE IS NO POINT TO THE RULE CHANGE

If something's not broken, why try fix it????