can you also pm the nameof the escort please leeOriginally Posted by LEE View Post
Stop all of you
fack phots fake profiels fuck alllllllllllllllllllllll
did any one knows about girle she had hiv+ and she was dating barazilan man was maried and hes wif daid in galway hospital
that girl speak very well english posh english she is away for long break and she is vih+
and all clients had reviews for her and all girles as her over 60+ reviews
what a maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaas
i just get information from some one i trust now
i should not post that worrning but i have no choice
so girles stop fighting for reviews and profiel and go for checkup with your gp now
Send me details, and if it is true, than the person should be banned-in America if an escort is arrested for illegal activitiy they're banned on some sites, so if a person does have HIV, than they should be too, actually if suspcion arises than that is reason enough for add staff to ask that the escort in question get tested, and if comes back negative than the cost of text could be subtracted from future add fees.
pm me roxy - and folks will u pm me what roxy told u? just in case she's trying to do in a few different girls.?
I dont think we will be getting a pm
But if the staff here do know the truth and the lady is advertising here , i would think that those actions are more illegal than lee's
fore
I fully agree with you Anita. But the reverse should also hold true. If what you are suggesting could be done and it transpires that these allegations are completely without foundation, then LEE/Roxy should be banned permanently from E-I for trying to ruin somebody's business.
I'm not erring on any side.....I'm supporting the suggestion that Anita made. She stated what should be done if an escort was found to be HIV+ and I'm stating what should be done if one escort sets out to maliciously ruin the business of another with completely false accusations.
If LEE/Roxy supplies the name of the escort that she is making this claim about to E-I, then maybe E-I would be in a position to follow up on Anita's suggestion.
I totally aware of this , but im unfamiliar with lee so i cannot comment on her intentions or whether she is capable of ruining someone business. The reason i said you were erring is because lee is now banned. So by these actions are you not admitting that the accusation is false .
And i believe that why this accusation is still up in the air , it is detrimental to a lot of escorts. Maybe not all punters but a small percentage might think twice about visiting an escort tomorrow.
I wasnt arguing with you by the way , i was just trying to put a different point view forward
fore