reviews!

[carlos marvado]

There is gonna be nobody left here.

Ahh don't be so negative Alec.....the Mods are here, you're here, Roxy is here, and for some unknown reason Sonny is still here, despite the fact that all his mates are across the road getting warnings for rule breaking to beat the band. I see one entire thread started by Nbt has already been deleted. You know I'm actually starting to feel sorry for Jake and David......I send you over there for a few days to bring life into the old place, and now we're being forced to deport the trolls over there and they'll wreck the place.

[patience]

Self destruction seems to be endemic here . . . relax ffs no one has died !

[RicFlair]

Self destruction seems to be endemic here . . . relax ffs no one has died !

Indeed. Its just our current drama. Lord knows what tomorrow will bring.

Stay tuned.

[patience]

The vast majority of punters and viewers of this site don't leave reviews, I presume a lot of punters use the review system to select an escort. Anyone with a smidgen of intelligence can weed out dodgy reviews, grammar and spelling would be your first rule of thumb.

Like every other industry in this country and any other country there is a percentage of mediocre and sub standard operators. The only way to to hurt them before they get you is not to support them.

Cant see the point of policing reviews, just put them all up and anyone with a brain and a tight pocket will work it out themselves.

Old saying goes 'a standing prick has no conscience ', this forum proves that saying wrong !

[El Gordo]

I won't argue further with hwdw because he's gone and got himself banned and therefore can't argue back, but I think this is the key:

Anyone with a smidgen of intelligence can weed out dodgy reviews, grammar and spelling would be your first rule of thumb.

It's your money. Before you call Anna or any escort, read the reviews. Don't rely on someone else's judgment about those reviews, whether it's mine or hwdw's or nbt's or the next review mod's.

[Alana]

The vast majority of punters and viewers of this site don't leave reviews, I presume a lot of punters use the review system to select an escort. Anyone with a smidgen of intelligence can weed out dodgy reviews, grammar and spelling would be your first rule of thumb.
Cant see the point of policing reviews, just put them all up and anyone with a brain and a tight pocket will work it out themselves. !

Meanwhile girls will have to look at lies and be questioned about dodgy reviews that are fake attached to their name?
At the moment alot of reviews of girls are downright insulting to say the least, by all means express an opinion for your fellow punter but unfortunatly there are to many people with agendas and use the review system as a stick in which to beat the escort in question.
Your only as good as your last game they say in football, well it's the same in this business and regardless of how many good reviews you have attention will only be drawn to the bad ones.
Barring a few other escorts it's looks like the majority could not care less one way or the other but watch the shit hit the fan when it's there credability that comes into question.

Elle x

[El Gordo]

We've discussed this in a different thread, but I don't think we reached much of a conclusion. For what it's worth, I would like to clarify what I think is reasonable to expect from a reviews mod, and what is not.

There are four things that moderators do or have done:
1) Enforce the rules. In other words, no information which could put the escort at risk, no explicit details for escorts who have indicated that they don't want them, etc.
2) Post reasonable replies from escorts, and occasionally replies to those from the reviewer.
3) Alert readers to things they would otherwise not be able to find out, like reviews from suspect ip addresses or for times when the escort was out of the country.
4) Judge whether the review looks credible.

I think 1-3 are important, and are all good reasons why reviews should continue to be moderated. In fact, I think more could be done with 3. Ideally some of these checks should be automatic when the review is received rather than being done manually when someone reports something suspicious. 4 is different. If I have the same information as the reviews mod then I prefer to use my judgment in place of his (or hers), since it's my money.

I think the best thing would be to separate the first three roles from the last. The last job is different, harder, not needed by everyone, and should not really be in the hands of one individual.

[dave1dave]

I don't think its fair to make such a personal attack on someone like this.

I would like to make a quick point...

Not everyone has the time or inclination to write reviews.
Just look at mine.. I did and spotted that there is a gap of over 17 months between my first review and my next one.. So did that make my first review a Fake/Rat review ???

Sometimes people register, post a few remarks or not, visit an escort and leave a review.

Having read all the reviews in question one of which is mine I can only see two reviews written by rainman and Eoin3 that could possibly be suspicious( I am in no way saying they are ), as in they nave no other reviews or posts, and had registered to leave a review.

But having met Anna for the first time myself, I would understand if someone did register just to leave a review - Thats what I did for my first review.

Your ban.. I think its well deserved.

[TiffanyTees]

Meanwhile girls will have to look at lies and be questioned about dodgy reviews that are fake attached to their name?
At the moment alot of reviews of girls are downright insulting to say the least, by all means express an opinion for your fellow punter but unfortunatly there are to many people with agendas and use the review system as a stick in which to beat the escort in question.
Your only as good as your last game they say in football, well it's the same in this business and regardless of how many good reviews you have attention will only be drawn to the bad ones.
Barring a few other escorts it's looks like the majority could not care less one way or the other but watch the shit hit the fan when it's there credability that comes into question.

Elle x

I must agree with Elle here as I had a couple both from the same ip as an agency it was proven and taken down from the another site but they must stay on here I was told they can check against ips for future ref but some folk read reviews like that and stay well clear.

Lucky for me the guys I know DO KNOW OF THIS

Tiff xx

[carlos marvado]

I don't think its fair to make such a personal attack on someone like this.

I would like to make a quick point...

Not everyone has the time or inclination to write reviews.
Just look at mine.. I did and spotted that there is a gap of over 17 months between my first review and my next one.. So did that make my first review a Fake/Rat review ???

No it does'nt Brother Dave. It just means you went a long time without writing a review, a long time without visiting an escort, or maybe, a long time without a spot of hanky panky in general. For your spiritual equilibrium, I sincerely hope that it was'nt the latter.

Happy punting Brother Dave.