This isnt fair

[anon361]

Option 1 , I would of thought. He says in the first line of review "he made a appointment"

nbt


ps i apoligise anon , i thought u and westie were talking about the same review.

the review in your original post will be removed.

No panic NBT, should have made that more obvious at the begining of my post, while your at it could you also remove his trusted reviewer badge

[ninebythree]

No panic NBT, should have made that more obvious at the begining of my post, while your at it could you also remove his trusted reviewer badge

What reason would i have to remove his trusted reviewer , just because hes over the the top at the top at times. In my opinion he has never lied in a review. The point of the trusted reviewer mark is to weed out the genuine reviewers from the fake reviewers.

Just because someone has a badge , that doesnt mean you have to agree with reviews. Its is obvious to me that he has very high expectation of what he expects from each appointment ,but this not mean he is not to be trusted.


As far the review i removed ,which was an error on my part and it should not been posted......................Peter cork does not post on the message board...(which is his choice ). The review system is his only outlet to point out overcharges by escorts.

nbt

[Eamon Dunphy Fan]

Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 017146 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

this isnt a review of the girl or her services.This is a once off miscommuinication.Its not even deliberate on the girls part as she phoned him back.

not fair,
Westside.

A disgrace - shameful behaviour- what we have here is a display lacking in moral courage.

[ploy26p]

A disgrace - shameful behaviour- what we have here is a display lacking in moral courage.

you crossed the line baby!!

[ninebythree]

A disgrace - shameful behaviour- what we have here is a display lacking in moral courage.

horan ,

ure some muppet


nbt

[jackpot]

A disgrace - shameful behaviour- what we have here is a display lacking in moral courage.

Here, here. He should be made give the girl an apology. Such cowardly behaviour to run away from her door and she on the way down the stairs to meet him. Shame on him!!!!

[Westsidex]

Option 1 , I would of thought. He says in the first line of review "he made a appointment"

nbt


ps i apoligise anon , i thought u and westie were talking about the same review.

the review in your original post will be removed.

if you didnt put up a submitted review youd get grief anyway.What i on about is this guy actually submitting it in the first place.

He even says she phoned him asking him where he was ,when he was half way back to his van.Almost everyone would say something to the tune of "thanks fro calling ,i will be back up in a few mins"or in Peters case in "2 mins and 45 secs".

The funny thing here is that guys complain about girls wasting their time and here this guy is,wasting his own time and then putting a review up.He is at fault here ,not the girl because she did phone him back when he went away.

10,9,8,7,6,5............
Westside.

[Westsidex]

Here, here. He should be made give the girl an apology. Such cowardly behaviour to run away from her door and she on the way down the stairs to meet him. Shame on him!!!!

it was trick or treat for Halloween,
Westside.

[jackpot]

it was trick or treat for Halloween,
Westside.

So Peter was 7 days late!! Shame on you Peter

[ninebythree]

how is it allowed for someone to write a review when he hasnt even met the escort

It one of the options in submitted a review as anon pointed out above.

you have three options when submitting a review.

Peter cork chose option 1 .........made an appointment but didnt recieve service(i cant remember exact wording).



nbt