It pisses me the foop off, because most people haven't a clue what they're fupping talking about when you hear them talking about climate change. Climate change is a natural phenomenon which has occurred many times in Earth's 4/5 billion year history, as it will continue to until the day the Earth essentially 'dies'. Now, we do influence things in a number of ways. I was reading recently how the Ozone layer has apparently fully healed - it was damaged due to a multitude of emissions problems such as CFCs in the.... 70's or 80's or even before them. Then there's us pumping more CO2 (carbon dioxide for those not familiar with empirical formulas) into the air, from cars/jets/etc - basically this is one of the main things those climate activists be harping on about. And yes it is a problem that needs to be resolved rather quickly. But here's the thing, everyone switching to electric cars for example isn't going to do diddly squat. More electric vehicles on the grid, the more of a demand on power generation there is. And what's the main source of power in Ireland? Petroleum based, I think accounts for like 45% or so of our energy production. So that's more burning of petroleum products! Then of course is the problem with batteries - the lithium mining isn't sustainable, and how is that mined? With petroleum fueled machines.
There was a breakthrough in fusion recently, which may be our saving grace though it's too early to tell. What astounds me though is why countries aren't looking into researching hydrogen energy more. Now there are problems with it, as it doesn't yield as much as other sources and there's problems with transport and storage. There is nuclear too, which is.... questionable to say the least. If contained properly, it's clean and has tremendous yield. And yet more and more countries are steering away from it? I dunno, it's complicated.
You know one thing I never hear being talked about in all these climate and environment debates or protests? Trees. I assume most people know the role trees play, but in case you don't: essentially, trees absorb CO2 and release oxygen (O2). Now that's a very basic and brief summary, but yeah it is just that really. Anyway, why am I talking about trees? It's estimated, that in the 200,000 years or so since Homo sapiens evolved (but especially so in the last 50k years or thereabouts), the global population of trees has been more than halved by us. Bearing in mind their role, I find it fascinating that nobody is talking about this. Essentially, trees only have half as much capability now of absorbing CO2, and still people think we have no affect on the environment?
Then there are other issues too, as mentioned by rbpdick's post above mine. At the end of the day, it's all a balancing act. But as ever, money makes the world go round and money dictates the course of action.
Last edited by ladiesman217; 13-01-23 at 20:38.
ladiesman217: April 2009 to April 2024
Goodbye