![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
IrishSarahBarra
Your orientation is what gender you’re attracted to, not what gender you have sex with. You control the first, you can’t control the second.
I disagreed with your premises here.
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
IrishSarahBarra
Yes, I’d say you’re in control of your orientation, it’s entirely about you are your perception (not that you can change it, just that it’s self). You have no control over what the other person’s gender is beyond what you can see, and you’ve no control over what they are on paper. I’d say that your orientation is self and not outside influences.
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
IrishSarahBarra
Well, unless I’m missing something, it’s either that or there’s no such thing as gender identity. I can’t see another explanation? And if there’s no such thing as gender identity it’s because there’s no such thing as the second meaning for gender. And if there’s no such thing as the second meaning for gender (or whatever you want to call the phenomenon) it must be because beyond biological conditions, being a woman = being a man
You haven't managed to convince me.
Orientation is a protected characteristic because it is seen as being an immutable, deterministic property of an individual. No one chooses what they are attracted to, it is determined by genetics and environment. Although I had no choice in being attracted to women I did have a choice, or at least had some say in, all of my previous sexual partners; all women or adult human females.
"Remove prostitutes from human affairs, and you will unsettle everything because of lusts..."
St Augustine