Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 83

Thread: Reviews Rules

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elle of Edinburgh View Post
    If it was my hard earned euro I'd be sure to check out all the available info contained in the reviews.
    And removing the positive review means that there will be less info available
    Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    And removing the positive review means that there will be less info available

    Not if he makes reference to his previous Visit in his new negative review

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,547
    Reviews
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    Thats good nine any chance the ratted reviews will be removed from the count total as well


    next on my list .................

    as for the question of a good review and bad review , i dont think it a big deal to leave one of each there in the small number of cases that it happens............but i will check with those that know.



    nbt

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    996
    Blog Entries
    1

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    I think you missed the point you get one review once a new review is posted the old one disappears so if a client posts a negative review there will be no evidence of the previous positive review would be visible all anyone will see is a negative review from that client.
    Stewie, yes, I probably missed the point and also the way I put my thoughts to words was a little strange and difficult to understand.

    So ... if an escort gets a negative review from someone who left before positive reviews for her, only the negative will show. This could be considered unfair from a review point of view but let's think about it.

    The review system is an indication of how the escort is, it was never intended to show one perfect 100% picture of all her encounters. If the escort gives occasionally a less then good service, as far as I'm concerned she could do it to anybody: a regular or a new client.

    The negative that escort receives is that little warning for other potential punters that the escort COULD ocasionally offer less then what is seen as a reasonable good service, so in this case you really think that potential clients will care if that negative review comes from someone who gave her positives in the past?

    If someone that reviewed me 2 or 3 times already (positive) would give me a deserved negative, then indeed my services went down. I am not talking here about a fake negative, as we are all refering to genuine reviews. All I have to do it's just take it on board and ensure nobody could give me a negative review again. Off days for an escort??? There shouldn't be any. I don't work if I don't feel capable, simple as that. Taking someone's money and giving a bad service based on the fact that I'm tired or not in the mood would make me a bad escort, so yes, in my opinion, an escort is as good as her latest reviews. Which client would care that in the past I used to be good when I gave him a bad service? He will be probably even more pissed off

    Trying to cool off an obsessed regular client by giving him a bad service ??? There are better ways to do that then this ... the easiest being: don't see that client ever again ! Assuming that client is giving a fake negative review, any escort has the chance to bring her own arguments on that review.

    I agreed in the past with the 3 reviews rule, that was a far better step then allowing some obsessed reviewer to review the same escort + X times and thous giving us a fake image about the escort popularity. The 1 review rule is more drastic, I admit it, but it is more focused on the client's perception on how a good escort is lately. Simplifying the review pages it makes easier for clients to decide.

    If the 3 review system is considered to be more fair then the 1 review system, I could live with that.
    I am not defending here a life or death subject, as far as I'm concerned I intend to keep getting positive reviews whatever the system may be.

    (Currently posting using ID "Sensual Delights")

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elle of Edinburgh View Post
    Not if he makes reference to his previous Visit in his new negative review
    Now you would be depending on the client to mention it.

    What if he doesn't mention it?
    Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Yes you seemed to have assumed the system would be what I'm actually suggesting.

    The negative would still be there as a warning so it would not take from that

    I wasn't suggesting an escort should give bad service to get rid of someone it was more that someone might retaliate at refusal by writing a bad review.

    Of a girl can refute a negative but I think it would be better to still be able to see the last positive. So for example if someone gives you a negative saying you don't look like your pictures your not attractive your appartment is in a bad location and filthy, it would be good to see he said the exact opposite 2 weeks earlier.

    I'm not suggesting a retention of 3 reviews 1 is plenty except where the nature of the review has changed from positive to negative.

    Quote Originally Posted by karin_27 View Post
    Stewie, yes, I probably missed the point and also the way I put my thoughts to words was a little strange and difficult to understand.

    So ... if an escort gets a negative review from someone who left before positive reviews for her, only the negative will show. This could be considered unfair from a review point of view but let's think about it.

    The review system is an indication of how the escort is, it was never intended to show one perfect 100% picture of all her encounters. If the escort gives occasionally a less then good service, as far as I'm concerned she could do it to anybody: a regular or a new client.

    The negative that escort receives is that little warning for other potential punters that the escort COULD ocasionally offer less then what is seen as a reasonable good service, so in this case you really think that potential clients will care if that negative review comes from someone who gave her positives in the past?

    If someone that reviewed me 2 or 3 times already (positive) would give me a deserved negative, then indeed my services went down. I am not talking here about a fake negative, as we are all refering to genuine reviews. All I have to do it's just take it on board and ensure nobody could give me a negative review again. Off days for an escort??? There shouldn't be any. I don't work if I don't feel capable, simple as that. Taking someone's money and giving a bad service based on the fact that I'm tired or not in the mood would make me a bad escort, so yes, in my opinion, an escort is as good as her latest reviews. Which client would care that in the past I used to be good when I gave him a bad service? He will be probably even more pissed off

    Trying to cool off an obsessed regular client by giving him a bad service ??? There are better ways to do that then this ... the easiest being: don't see that client ever again ! Assuming that client is giving a fake negative review, any escort has the chance to bring her own arguments on that review.

    I agreed in the past with the 3 reviews rule, that was a far better step then allowing some obsessed reviewer to review the same escort + X times and thous giving us a fake image about the escort popularity. The 1 review rule is more drastic, I admit it, but it is more focused on the client's perception on how a good escort is lately. Simplifying the review pages it makes easier for clients to decide.

    If the 3 review system is considered to be more fair then the 1 review system, I could live with that.
    I am not defending here a life or death subject, as far as I'm concerned I intend to keep getting positive reviews whatever the system may be.
    Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    Now you would be depending on the client to mention it.

    What if he doesn't mention it?
    The fact he's leaving a negative this time round would suggest he would mention it, as he had something to compere his last visit with i'd have thought.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elle of Edinburgh View Post
    The fact he's leaving a negative this time round would suggest he would mention it, as he had something to compere his last visit with i'd have thought.
    I think you are presuming all reviews are genuine and all reviewers motives are honourable. I don't think that is the case.
    Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sonny View Post
    i think your both making a fair point and to my mind there should be some sort of indication, wheter it be a box ticked or an indication of the no of reviews left, to know that a review is not a neg on its own but has a previous positive review or reviews
    That's not a bad idea either sonny I think I would prefer to be able to read the last positive as well though.
    Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    I think you are presuming all reviews are genuine and all reviewers motives are honourable.
    In an ideal world they would be, but alas there's more chance of hell freezing over.......


    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    I don't think that is the case.
    I know through experiance that it's not the case

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •