Quote Originally Posted by El Gordo View Post

In general, the higher this number is the more reliable the reviews.

As always, no statistical measure can substitute for reading the reviews!
Excellent work again El Gordo !!! I am very confident you are going to find eventually a fool proof scientific way to calculate the credibility of escort reviews, I am just not very sure that the median number is the solution.

The median number could indeed be a very useful tool for calculating the reliability of some escorts.
Why am I saying some instead of all? Because in my opinion, this number would help you decide indeed between some relatively new escorts with only a few reviews and for which no other reliable information is available (like recommendation, lady's own postings etc). If you have to chose between escort A, escort B and escort C (with the reviews as below, there is indeed a much better chance for you to pick escort C in this case:

Escort A: 1, 1, 2, 3, 4.
Escort B: 1, 1, 3, 5, 6.
Escort C: 1, 3, 5, 8, 10.

However, the situation complicates a lot when you have to decide between escorts with more reviews. Take for example Mellisa, Kat and Alyssa:

Escort Reviews of Melissa, Irish escort from Escort Ireland
Escort Reviews of Kat, Irish escort from Escort Ireland
Escort Reviews of Alyssa, Irish escort from Escort Ireland

Based on your stats, the reviews reliability for these ladies would be:

1 st place: Melissa
2nd place: Kat
3rd place: Alyssa

Well, looking trough their reviews we can see for a start that Melissa has a total of 30 reviews, from which:

- 10 ratted positive reviews
- 15 positive reviews
- 2 negative reviews
- 1 neutral review
- 1 N/A review

In comparation, Kat would have 21 reviews, from which:

- 1 single ratted positive review
- 19 positive reviews
- 1 negative reviews

Alyssa's situation for her 70 reviews:

- 1 single ratted negative review
- 68 positive reviews
- 1 N/A review

In conclusion: the median number cannot be used to check if escort reviews are more reliable then others. Who would be more credible, an escort with a third of her reviews ratted & 50 % positive unrated reviews (Mellisa) or an escort with 90 % positive unrated reviews (Kat) or another escort with 97 % of positive unrated reviews (Alyssa) ???


P.S. In reality, as the ladies I picked as an example here have each a sufficient number of reviews to make them very credible as escorts, a punter will see any of the ladies I picked as an example based on how attractive he would find them, their price and their availability. If I am allowed to quote Mr Jolly's joke that he made on your previous thread about reviews: "after several computations, permutation etc ... the one I'm going to see tonite is ... the one with bigger tits ".

P.P.S. I really find your work, your time & efforts simply excellent and I do apologise if my reply to your thread may seem like I contest them. I firmly believe that scientific measures could be useful in this case, I just think that something as simple as the median number is not a measure powerful enough to be applied across all reviews and escorts.