are you in favour of a probationary period for noobs?

[ninebythree]

I think.... stick them in a new forum for a couple of weeks , then let them out


nbt

[Bigbadjohn]

I think.... stick them in a new forum for a couple of weeks , then let them out


nbt

the same for doing reviews?


bbj

[ninebythree]

the same for doing reviews?


bbj

i have said this in the past that no noob should be allowed post a review till they are joined two wks and i was ignored by u know who

i was left with no option , but to take matters in to my own hands on that score


nbt

[carlos marvado]

You cant on the one hand rat every newbie's first review and on the other hand try and encourage genuine punters to submit reviews to assist the punting fraternity. If I were a newbie and my first genuine review was ratted, my attitude would be quite simple......"sod this place, why should I bother my arse trying to inform my peers of who is a good/bad service provider".

The recent case of a member who had all his reviews (and there were many of them) ratted, proves that a fake reviewer can be a long standing member just as easily as a newbie. Except that the long standing member is more likely to get away with it.

[ninebythree]

You cant on the one hand rat every newbie's first review and on the other hand try and encourage genuine punters to submit reviews to assist the punting fraternity.

I never mention ratting a noobs first review and that is not happening, so i dont know where u get your info from , but kindly sticks to the facts


nbt

[carlos marvado]

I never mention ratting a noobs first review and that is not happening, so i dont know where u get your info from , but kindly sticks to the facts


nbt

Quotation:
Irish Escort Reviews: Review 014971
WARNING: We are suspicious of this review, it might be a FAKE. We Smell a Rat!

Escort(s): Angelina

Reviewer:
escourt lover
Join Date: 06/09/09
Message Board Usergroup: Registered User
Message Board Posts: 0
Reviews: 1

Type:
Female Escort
Location: Galway
Incall or Outcall: Incall
Time / Date: 4pm / 07/09/09
Duration: 30 Minutes
Cost: €150
Review: well lads a total stunner photos are real and seldom does a gil with a body like this come to galway nice manner to pitty no kissing owo is lovely


****REGISTERED TO LEAVE REVIEW AND FIRST REVIEW OF ESCORT****NBT
Accuracy of Photos: Very Satisfied
Incall Location: Fairly Satisfied
Physical Appearance: Very Attractive
Service Provided: Very Satisfied
Value for Money: Very Satisfied
Overall Satisfaction Very Satisfied
Would You Recommend? Yes
Would You See Again?: Yes

This review was submitted or last updated on 07/09/09.

Click here to read more reviews of Angelina.

Click here to read more reviews by escourt lover.

End of quotation.

This member, escourt lover, registered to submit his first review. Countless other people have registered on E-I, not to take part in the community section, but to share their punting experiences with an escort with their fellow punters. Other than the fact, that this is escourt lover's first review, that he registered to submit it, and that it is Angelina's first review, is there any hard evidence that would suggest that "this review might be a fake".

It's just that Community Moderators in the Patcave like to work on hard evidence and give people the benefit of the "innocent until proven guilty" principle.

P.S. I'm not saying that this review is not a fake.....it could well be one.....I'm just taking issue with some of the assumptions that underly the adjudication of reviews.

[ninebythree]

WARNING: We are suspicious of this review, it might be a FAKE. We Smell a Rat!


This member, escourt lover, registered to submit his first review. Countless other people have registered on E-I, not to take part in the community section, but to share their punting experiences with an escort with their fellow punters. Other than the fact, that this is escourt lover's first review, that he registered to submit it, and that it is Angelina's first review, is there any hard evidence that would suggest that "this review might be a fake".

It's just that Community Moderators in the Patcave like to work on hard evidence and give people the benefit of the "innocent until proven guilty" principle.

P.S. I'm not saying that this review is not a fake.....it could well be one.....I'm just taking issue with some of the assumptions that underly the adjudication of reviews.

Firstly,
you implied that all new reviewers were being ratted this is not the case.

secondly
If there is any hard evidence , why would it be made public knowledge , to tip off other fake reviewers is it

thirdly
it says .......we are suspicoius of the review ....it might be a fake

And weither you like it or not , i answer only to patricia ,the reviewer and the escort because unlike you im not a community moderator.

nbt