Results 1 to 10 of 73

Thread: Robbery issues/discussion

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    Well it doesn't take a genius to work it out.. Look at all the (defensive)posts, it speaks for itself.
    Anyway i dont need an account to be able to read over some of the forum posts now and again
    Also many other UK & Irish girls i know have mentioned how obvious this is and from what i've read they are 100% correct..
    Clearly this website and the "moderators" who "police" it aren't as responsible and ethical as they make out they are

    I rest my case!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,826
    Reviews
    35

    Default

    How do you expect us to take you serious with no real proof. Provide some proof and post under your usual profile. Perhaps then people would take you serious. Otherwise it's just seen as someone stirring trouble.
    Help Keyla in her fight with cancer. Every little helps.
    It could happen to any of us.
    https://gofund.me/8e340537

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehighwayman View Post
    How do you expect us to take you serious with no real proof. Provide some proof and post under your usual profile. Perhaps then people would take you serious. Otherwise it's just seen as someone stirring trouble.
    https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...de-modded.html

    How come when doozer was accused of being a pimp the person was given 24 hours to back it up retract or be permanently banned.

    Why is one course taken when a mod is accused of being a pimp but another when an ordinary member is accused. Is it one set of rules for mods and another for the rest of us it makes luthers claims that mods are just ordinary members ring a little hollow.
    Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default There are differences Stewie......

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    How come when doozer was accused of being a pimp the person was given 24 hours to back it up retract or be permanently banned.
    In Doozers case that was the last post of a troll, he had shown he was a troll in all his 10 earlier posts, and he started a thread about Doozer.
    Doozer was also not the only person mentioned in that post you refer to in the link you provided.........

    There were 2 people accused in there, it was a little more specific than your case........

    In your case, it was a first post, they did not start a thread and I spent the whole night here watching out for their return with my finger on the ban button should it warrant it.........

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    Is it one set of rules for mods and another for the rest of us it makes luthers claims that mods are just ordinary members ring a little hollow.
    If you're bothered to read my posts in the tread you provided a link to you would know that I never claimed that "mods" were ordinary members. I said on many occasions that was my view on how I viewed myself..........

    I've tried to explain this in the very last post in that thread, it you cannot understand that at this stage I'm afraid I will have to accept the fact that to you, it will remain forever inexplicable.........

    I have tried.........here it is........

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    For your kind words and honest opinion...........

    But the problem is, all that I have ever stated here is how I view myself, not how other view me.........

    Yes I fully see you point and accept that, yes I do have the ability to do things here that others don't, I personally don't see this as some great prize bestowed upon me for any particular reason, nor do I view it as a burden, I have the ability to do these things as an agreement with the site owner for the good of the site, this forum and it's members. No other reason. I'm quite happy to do these things, humbled to be asked, and I will continue to do these things to the best of my ability. I don't come here to do these things, I do them when I come here..........

    As I say, I'm only stating how I view myself here, and as much as I may want others to view me this way, I fully accept the reasons they cannot..........

    Again, thanks Ber, I value your opinion and thank you for your comments.........
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    In Doozers case that was the last post of a troll, he had shown he was a troll in all his 10 earlier posts, and he started a thread about Doozer.
    Doozer was also not the only person mentioned in that post you refer to in the link you provided.........

    There were 2 people accused in there, it was a little more specific than your case........

    In your case, it was a first post, they did not start a thread and I spent the whole night here watching out for their return with my finger on the ban button should it warrant it.........


    Luther that is bullshit an allegation is an allegation whether it is in the middle of a thread or set up specifically to make that allegation it makes no difference.

    Secondly 2 people accused is again not borne out by the reply from carlos

    I dont know what your beef with doozer is, but you've got 24 hours to either back that allegation up with some hard evidence, retract it here or be permanently banned.
    It is clear from that reply that he is only concerned with the allegation in relation to Doozer and makes no mention of Lorna. And you are not seriously trying to suggest that had S Talker alleged that doozer was a pimp but not said who he was pimping that the reaction from carlos would have been any different.

    As for the troll thing carlos makes no mention of trolling in the threat to ban the threat to ban is made only on the allegation that doozer is a pimp if the troll thing was relevant then why didn't carlos just ban straight away as you have said he had already shown he was a troll. No the only reason he was threatened with a ban was because he made an allegation that Doozer was a pimp.

    So my question remains if it was good enough for Doozer why is it not good enough in this case that the same rule is applied back it up retract it or be permanently banned????


    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post

    If you're bothered to read my posts in the tread you provided a link to you would know that I never claimed that "mods" were ordinary members. I said on many occasions that was my view on how I viewed myself..........

    I've tried to explain this in the very last post in that thread, it you cannot understand that at this stage I'm afraid I will have to accept the fact that to you, it will remain forever inexplicable.........

    I have tried.........here it is........
    I read your posts and my point remains that you want to view yourself as ordinary members and presumably you would like other members not to view the mods as separate that was the tenor of your various posts with ber over numerous threads. If that is honestly what you desire then the only way that could be achieved is if the same rules are applied to ordinary members and to moderators.




    You are right this case is different but the difference is not the ones you claim it is that in Doozers case it was a mod using his banning power to defend another mod against an allegation that he was a pimp that is the difference.
    Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Well Stewie........

    These were the factors I took into consideration when I was looking at it............

    I immediately viewed it as bullshit.......

    How did you view it when you saw it???

    A serious allegation???
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    These were the factors I took into consideration when I was looking at it............

    I immediately viewed it as bullshit.......

    How did you view it when you saw it???

    A serious allegation???


    As serious as the one leveled at Doozer

    The same allegation but a different response that is what I am pointing out as such it appears that the mods are making rules depending on who the allegation is made against, and frankly you have confirmed this by raising a couple of red herrings regarding trolling and 2 people and the start of a thread.
    None of that is relevant

    Why is it a serious allegation to claim Doozer is a pimp but just bullshit that can be ignored in this case????
    Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,891
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kinkyemma View Post
    Well it doesn't take a genius to work it out.. Look at all the (defensive)posts, it speaks for itself.
    Anyway i dont need an account to be able to read over some of the forum posts now and again
    Also many other UK & Irish girls i know have mentioned how obvious this is and from what i've read they are 100% correct..
    Clearly this website and the "moderators" who "police" it aren't as responsible and ethical as they make out they are

    I rest my case!
    So your evidence is some unnamed people said it and you believe them, well I guess you have me bang to rights now


    Why don't you provide some links then you can also link to me defending Irish escorts fuck sake I even defended nicegirls am I his pimp as well. lol

    You are a troll I have a good idea who you are
    Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •