Reviews: Should there be a limit?

[Forceuser]

Pure honesty from him, but I felt he was perhaps a little fussy and maybe, just maybe not so popular with the ladies.

that comes across in an honest review anyway,i've read a few poor reviews where i've been left
saying to myself "this guys just a bit of a prick!"

[Rockerman]

jez, keep the head, nobody is claiming to be an authority, just pointing out the obvious faults, oh yeah and I'm really glad you have seen loads and loads of escorts, fair play to ye, you're a great lad because going by your reviews it kind of looked like you were just stalking one or two.
anyway you have a lovely day now

(and before you get clever, yes I do see the irony in my post )

Haha fair enough. I hope we're all straightened out. It's better to get along . Yes I've seen loads just like yourself .

[David Feckem]

Or they could be protecting the great escorts livelihoods from losing business to the
not so great ones

fair and balanced should be the order of the day,i say

I agree with this too. But great escorts will survive and thrive regardless of the opinions of hobbyists.
Luanna28 may well be the next Eotm but it really doesn't matter. She will be a success regardless.

[Rockerman]

I agree with this. Guys on here obsessing and talking simple shit to death, trying to make it seem complicated.

Good. No bothers man .

[rockonallnite]

Can the moderators tell us why the old review system ( 1 review per punter per girl) was changed?
Maybe now it's too late to change the system again.

Coming back to inspector's question, should it be a limit, yes I think it should. I think 3 is a good number. If you want to write a 4th your last review of her should be replaced then.

At the end of the day you have some profiles with lots of reviews but on closer inspection, they are repeat visits.

I tried to be as accurate as possible in my rating, but in more than one occasion the escort was pissed off with my rating.

[TommyH123]

Just counted 16 for Viktoria and 8 for Brianna...what's your point? I'm hardly looking at records haha. Lucky me I say. As I've said before I've visited Viktoria about 40 times. Brianna I've visited 8 times...she has 400+ reviews mate so my 8 doesn't exactly define her. Sure hop in the car and take a spin down south. You'll be happy enough. Maybe they'll please you enough for a four star review .

oh I have left a 3 star, you seem to have been very lucky so far

[TommyH123]

Haha fair enough. I hope we're all straightened out. It's better to get along . Yes I've seen loads just like yourself .

yeah, we can agree to disagree i suppose

[Rockerman]

oh I have left a 3 star, you seem to have been very lucky so far

Let it go Tommy. I'm having an unproductive day at work. I already moved on and you're going back a page .

[TommyH123]

Can the moderators tell us why the old review system ( 1 review per punter per girl) was changed?
Maybe now it's too late to change the system again.

Coming back to inspector's question, should it be a limit, yes I think it should. I think 3 is a good number. If you want to write a 4th your last review of her should be replaced then.

At the end of the day you have some profiles with lots of reviews but on closer inspection, they are repeat visits.

I tried to be as accurate as possible in my rating, but in more than one occasion the escort was pissed off with my rating.

actually that's a good suggestion, a max of three and the oldest deleted or left on your own profile page where only you can see them

[TheSavannah]

I'm not speaking as a moderator, I'm speaking as a spectator

The review system is supposed to keep track of the encounters escorts have and their clients' ratings of those encounters. I imagine, I just imagine, that all the encounters are different.
What is the problem with their clients keeping a record of each and every encounter? Are they all the same?

A good number are 3 reviews based on what exactly?
Isn't it a good sign that an escort has clients who want to visit her constantly?

I ask these questions a bit to find out what the problem is now.