Reviews: Should there be a limit?

[IDF2]

not so simple
1 not enough
what if first time you're treated like a king
and next time you're treated like a chump

The last chump review remains.

Simple.

[Forceuser]

The last chump review remains.

Simple.

But then its not a fair reflection of the whole story

[Irelandbeautyyy]

And here is some opinion from escort. Well, i absolutely got your point but i cant see a reson why you are bothered about it... If you see more reviews from one client for one escort, there is nothing more simple than not reading this review and move for other reviews. Its not only about you. All reviews in every business is some feedback for providers. Its not only about reccomendation to others but its good way how to say thank you. I always smile when iam reading my review. It makes my day better and i know i made happier someone if he took his time to write me a review.

There is nothing better than some feedback - saying thank you in person, nice text after appoitment or also your review. Its my motivation every day to do my work with smile.

[rockonallnite]

Should there be a limit on the amount of reviews a client can write for a provider?

The rules state that a client can leave a maximum of 1 review per advertiser per week. Is this too much? Should it just be one review per advertiser?

How and why would you change it, or do you think there's no problem?

Reviews serve 3 purposes I think.

1 feedback for the escort.

2 they count towards winning EOTM.

3 Information for other clients.

I think it should be a maximum of 3 reviews per punter per girl. otherwise is just plain stalking!!��

I have seen punters reviewing the same girl 10 or 15 times. So in the end that opinion is quite bias.
In the old days there was 1 review per punter per girl. If you wanted to write another review for the same girl, the old one was replaced by the new one.
I thought it was good but felt short somehow.
3 is the magic number...

On another note I think the wayback machine caused a bit of a shock to some people the other night. Pity that was a good thread☹

[Rockerman]

Reviews serve 3 purposes I think.

1 feedback for the escort.

2 they count towards winning EOTM.

3 Information for other clients.

I think it should be a maximum of 3 reviews per punter per girl. otherwise is just plain stalking!!��

I have seen punters reviewing the same girl 10 or 15 times. So in the end that opinion is quite bias.
In the old days there was 1 review per punter per girl. If you wanted to write another review for the same girl, the old one was replaced by the new one.
I thought it was good but felt short somehow.
3 is the magic number...

On another note I think the wayback machine caused a bit of a shock to some people the other night. Pity that was a good thread☹

I can't remember that thread haha.

[TommyH123]

i wouldn't be care about the quantity of reviews, the credibility of the review system is more of an issue, I'd be more concerned with weeding out the more unbelievable ones, I'm sure we've all noticed the same reviews from the same accounts which read like total bs, long bookings, all 5 star, all the time, yeah right.....whatever

[Rockerman]

i wouldn't be care about the quantity of reviews, the credibility of the review system is more of an issue, I'd be more concerned with weeding out the more unbelievable ones, I'm sure we've all noticed the same reviews from the same accounts which read like total bs, long bookings, all 5 star, all the time, yeah right.....whatever

You have five reviews in a row for the same escort...all five star so what is your point? I believe those reviews though. I'm assuming she's a good escort and you like her. Not that hard to follow for me atleast.

I have noticed a reviewer who seems to do 8/10/12 hour bookings every time. It sounded like bullshit to me and then I heard it was and that he was actually doing 30 minute meetings and was something of a nuisance.

[TommyH123]

You have five reviews in a row for the same escort...all five star so what is your point? I believe those reviews though. I'm assuming she's a good escort and you like her. Not that hard to follow for me atleast.

I have noticed a reviewer who seems to do 8/10/12 hour bookings every time. It sounded like bullshit to me and then I heard it was and that he was actually doing 30 minute meetings and was something of a nuisance.

yeah, you assume correctly, worthy of every single star but that's pretty obvious I guess, anyway, I'm not concerned about my reviews, I was present for all of them.
its those long bookings you mentioned, there's a bang of horse shit off them but they stay on the system because they are all 5 star and suit the narrative being peddled.

[Forceuser]

i wouldn't be care about the quantity of reviews, the credibility of the review system is more of an issue, I'd be more concerned with weeding out the more unbelievable ones, I'm sure we've all noticed the same reviews from the same accounts which read like total bs, long bookings, all 5 star, all the time, yeah right.....whatever

i think people forget when they choose to never write anything but 5 star reviews
that they could be indirectly taking some business away from a good escort who worked hard
for her deserved 100% rating

[TommyH123]

i think people forget when they choose to never write anything but 5 star reviews
that they could be indirectly taking some business away from a good escort who worked hard
for her deserved 100% rating

exactly, if all escorts are 5 star every time then how are you supposed to make an informed decision?, what's the deciding factor?