In fairness to him WD is was borderline, when you look at this type of picture and your gut can't tell you if she's a minor then I would advise people to not post it. I don't want to give the impression to people who did not see it that it was clearly a child as it was not. It was borderline but the facial features looked to me like that of a 15 to 17 year old age range so as I say better to err on the side of extreme caution in such matters as serious as E-I hosting a pic of a minor in law and the implications and circumstances to the subject in the picture...
In fairness to nicegirls irrespective of whether he should have been banned first alwing a thread about him to remain open while he was banned and unable to defend himself was unfair. That thread should have been temporarily closed till nice was back and able to defend himself. It seems that he was banned a little to quickly and then enticed back to defend himself and banned again for that.
Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again
Then if he or anyone wishes to continue to defend themselves then they remain withing the rules in defending themselves...
How on Earth is telling a Woman to go f herself and call her a B***h defending himself????
Its quite simple, work within the rules and mods and members paths with never cross.
No way should a thread be closed because the subject of the thread is unable to restrain his foul mouth to another member....
Should a pub be closed because of one drunken customer? no, you turf the drunk onto the street to sober up and let the others enjoy their night and if they happen to talk about the drunk in his absence then so be it.
Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 23-07-09 at 16:21.
Totaly agree with this but thats the norm as far as i can make out on this site they ban rather than let people defend themselves
And in fairness people have said worse to nicegirls than go fuck yourself and recieved no sanction and i cant understand anyone sticking up for anna considering her two faced nature was exposed some time ago