Reviews edited before publishing

[FullIrish]

I like to leave reviews for women who do deserve them, but I occasionally forget, actually I usually forget. But I don't leave bad reviews of any experiences that I haven’t enjoyed. Reason being, what's the point?

I'd rather lift up the good and ignore the bad, and on top of that there's so many reasons that a poor visit might occur. Who am I to damage someone else’s livelihood over something as trivial as not clicking during sex. It is what it is, and I must say it happens rarely, maybe 1 out of every 10 visits are below expectations. But it's no big deal to me really, I'll move on and chalk it up to an experience.

But to the provider, it could mean a lot to get bad reviews, it could mean the difference between being able to afford rent or even sending money back home to their family. We don't know what most of providers make or do with their money but I'm fairly sure they're not all flush and rolling in money so much that they are cool with having their business fecked due to a bad day or two.

And besides all that, if you have a bit of cop on and nuance you can leave reviews or see reviews or patterns that can paint a clear enough picture. And this is well possible to do without having your review removed or edited too much.

[MidlifeCrisis]

Regarding services that they do not have listed, you have to keep in mind that something they have provided for you does not mean they will provide for others.
For this reason we have removed those references.

Everyone understands the purpose of the rule. It is just that some mods will apply discretion when it is obviously harmless and some won't. Most escorts will give a gentle backrub sometimes, in relaxed parts of an appointment. That is no threat to a professional masseuse. I don't know if escort profiles have an option to list massage as a favourite, but I can't remember seeing it. It is not comparable to intimate services which the rule was created to protect.

[whoseyourdaddy]

I like to leave reviews for women who do deserve them, but I occasionally forget, actually I usually forget. But I don't leave bad reviews of any experiences that I haven’t enjoyed. Reason being, what's the point?

I'd rather lift up the good and ignore the bad, and on top of that there's so many reasons that a poor visit might occur. Who am I to damage someone else’s livelihood over something as trivial as not clicking during sex. It is what it is, and I must say it happens rarely, maybe 1 out of every 10 visits are below expectations. But it's no big deal to me really, I'll move on and chalk it up to an experience.

But to the provider, it could mean a lot to get bad reviews, it could mean the difference between being able to afford rent or even sending money back home to their family. We don't know what most of providers make or do with their money but I'm fairly sure they're not all flush and rolling in money so much that they are cool with having their business fecked due to a bad day or two.

And besides all that, if you have a bit of cop on and nuance you can leave reviews or see reviews or patterns that can paint a clear enough picture. And this is well possible to do without having your review removed or edited too much.

Fully with you here FullIirish. Thanks..

[manonamission]

Hi there,

Which moderator has not replied to a message from you?
We answer all the ones that come to us, I think any poster will be able to verify it.
Maybe you didn't get the response you were hoping for? I'm very sorry, we can't always please everyone with our decision.

lola and ray but see i got a pm now, i first sent pm 2 weeks ago, i didnt get a response at all, there was no valid reason for not allowing the review but does not matter now

[Rooney2808]

I'm a new member here and the piece of advice I was given most, and from what I see all newbies are given the same advice, is to choose escorts with good reviews and plenty of them. It is pretty sound advice, if an escort has over 100 positive reviews then you can be pretty sure you will have a good experience with her.
If an escort has 100 positive reviews and 5 not so good reviews I'm sure most punters have the "cop on and nuance" to come to the conclusion that despite a small minority of bad reviews that the escort is very good but some have had a bad experience with her.

I saw someone compare the reviews to Tripadvisor but that analogy doesn't work as we're dealing with the relationship between 2 people, and people are hugely complicated beings, not how well cooked a fillet steak is! If the chemistry is off then it can lead to a bad experience. Now it could come down to just plain bad chemistry between punter and escort and that's it, nothing to be done, this happens. The escort could be having a bad day, happens us all, the punter could be having a bad day, again happens us all. These experiences are going to happen and are par for the course and in a perfect world people (punters and escorts) would be able to admit "I wasn't at my best that day and it led to a bad experience, sorry". But this will never happen. How to police reviews in a situation like this I have absolutely no idea!!

I'm sure nobody here wants to leave a bad review to try and disrupt somebody's livelihood but at the same time it is a professional service that is being supplied and punters can expect a level of professionalism. There was a comment here about an escort being in her pyjamas and looking dishevelled, now I think a punter should be allowed to say this in their review, they didn't get the level of professionalism they expected.

Not sure what I'm trying to sayin this long message lol but I guess it comes back to being a newbie and being told to always check reviews and then discovering the reviews aren't all that trustworthy, review systems never usually are, but I think the system here certainly needs some balance.
I think it is an incredibly difficult job to get the right balance of allowing genuine negative reviews and weeding out ones that come from a punter who is disgruntled that they did not get a favourite they wanted, this is an escorts choice and shouldn't lead to a bad review in my opinion.

[MidlifeCrisis]

Not sure what I'm trying to sayin this long message lol but I guess it comes back to being a newbie and being told to always check reviews and then discovering the reviews aren't all that trustworthy, review systems never usually are, but I think the system here certainly needs some balance.
I think it is an incredibly difficult job to get the right balance of allowing genuine negative reviews and weeding out ones that come from a punter who is disgruntled that they did not get a favourite they wanted, this is an escorts choice and shouldn't lead to a bad review in my opinion.

A lot of frustration in these forums is about the benefit of the doubt tending to go in the escort's favour too often, but that is as is should be. If a genuine negative review is rejected, the consequence is that a client is annoyed for a while. If a fake negative review gets through, it can badly affect an escort's business, sometimes forcing them to opt out of reviews. As long as the mods make reasonable efforts to identify a genuine bad one, I don't mind if they get the occasional one wrong.

[manonamission]

A lot of frustration in these forums is about the benefit of the doubt tending to go in the escort's favour too often, but that is as is should be. If a genuine negative review is rejected, the consequence is that a client is annoyed for a while. If a fake negative review gets through, it can badly affect an escort's business, sometimes forcing them to opt out of reviews. As long as the mods make reasonable efforts to identify a genuine bad one, I don't mind if they get the occasional one wrong.

That is a cop out. Ok it can affect their business but if they scam and cheat clients then they should not be in business anyway, should they? they need to be weeded out and let the real genuine escorts flourish here
Its just any excuse to not publish negative reviews and its selfish and greedy ploy,

[MidlifeCrisis]

That is a cop out. Ok it can affect their business but if they scam and cheat clients then they should not be in business anyway, should they? they need to be weeded out and let the real genuine escorts flourish here
Its just any excuse to not publish negative reviews and its selfish and greedy ploy,

The trouble is there are scumbag clients who try to use the threat of a bad review to get advantage, and there are scumbag escorts who leave bad reviews for rivals. They also need weeded out to let the genuine ladies flourish. Plenty of bad reviews do get published, so it is clear there is not a blanket site policy to remove them.

[EscortInspector]

A lot of frustration in these forums is about the benefit of the doubt tending to go in the escort's favour too often, but that is as is should be. If a genuine negative review is rejected, the consequence is that a client is annoyed for a while. If a fake negative review gets through, it can badly affect an escort's business, sometimes forcing them to opt out of reviews. As long as the mods make reasonable efforts to identify a genuine bad one, I don't mind if they get the occasional one wrong.

Reminiscent of (Sir William) Blackstone's Ratio: "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer". I completely agree.

People don't change overnight, someone involved in deception or wrongdoing will eventually be found out.

[rockonallnite]

This is not rocket science. Each one of us has reviews, written for escorts. Some with 50, other with 100, or 200. Obviously that reviewers opinion has to be more valid than the one from a newbie. We have been playing this game for a while, but we are all treated equally.
Don't get me wrong here, in other forums, each punter has positives and negatives votes like the green bars and red bars here.

They should use that as an indicator when the mods judge if a review is genuine or not. Also something very simple, clients, with
little amount of experience or green bars should not be allow to put bad reviews, because they can be used as an extortion tool. But clients voices that are tried and tested, and are genuine should be listened to also.
That's my 2 cents...if they want to improve the system.