why didnt you tell ppl this at the start of the thread, or at gave them a clue, at least then, your moral high ground wouldnt look so shallowOriginally Posted by Westsidex
Banned User
Becoming Addicted to E-I
why didnt you tell ppl this at the start of the thread, or at gave them a clue, at least then, your moral high ground wouldnt look so shallow
I never claimed to have this high moral standing
apparently some do.Any proper Jackson fan would have seen this pic because they will be lloking at them for the next week.We will have a fatboy poinying fingers on behalf of Jacksons family yet why didnt this fatboy pull Jackson to one side and tell him to go away and look after himself.why didnt you tell ppl this at the start of the thread, or at gave them a clue, at least then, your moral high ground wouldnt look so shallow
Fatty will blame the doc,not Jackson himself nor Jacksons fans.Nope the fatboy wants to blame someone.
Easy to blame,
Westside.
Banned User
Becoming Addicted to E-I
Well how many MJ fans on this forum are you 100 percent sure youve caught out, if any?
I never claimed to have this high moral standing
apparently some do.Any proper Jackson fan would have seen this pic because they will be looking at them for the next week.We will have a fatboy pointing fingers on behalf of Jacksons family yet why didnt this fatboy pull Jackson to one side and tell him to go away and look after himself.why didnt you tell ppl this at the start of the thread, or at gave them a clue, at least then, your moral high ground wouldnt look so shallow
Fatty will blame the doc,not Jackson himself.Nope the fatboy wants to blame someone.
Easy to blame,
Westside.
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
Blanket respect for the dead is a load of bollox if someone was a cunt the fact that they are no longer breathing does not make them any better. That said Jackson was no convicted of anything afaik and people had plenty of time to make allegations against him when he was alive.
He had some strange views and some people saw dollar signs as far as I can see.
On jordy chandler who would accept money and let a child abuser roam free instead of convicting the cunt. On the other kid who would let their child sleep in a bed with a strange man especially after the previous allegations.
On pictures of the dead or dying personally I have no problem with them they make some very powerful images for example the Iranian student dying in Tehran. Even the previous mentioned Hillsborough if the images of that event had not been captured and beamed around the world it is unlikely the improvements in ground safety would have happened.
Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again
On Hillsborough it's not so much the pictures I have a problem with its this
Banned User
Becoming Addicted to E-I
heres one of a dead superstar
and heres a pics of people taking photos of the dead pope
and an article about it BBC NEWS | UK | Magazine | Snapping the dead pope on a camera phone
if MJ pops his clogs right in front of me i,d reach for the phone/camera
Slight difference there pb. The pope is laying in state so that people can view him and pay their respects. If you like, taking pictures in this instance is authorised by the church, but one could still possibly view it as being in bad taste. I think paparazzi or others taking photos of a dieing Princess Di or Michael Jackson is an invasion of privacy, the sole purpose of which is to sell newspapers and/or make money from those with a fascination for the morbid.
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
What about the right to privacy of that young Iranian student or those people dying on a football field or does the right to privacy in death only extend to those you used the media when alive to further their career or heighten their public profile.
Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again
My list was'nt meant to be exhaustive Stewie. I think there is possiby a difference between a picture of many corpses i.e. after an earthquake, war scenario etc. where no individual casualty is identifiable from the picture and a close up of one or more individuals, which their relatives might then have to look at in the papers as the last reminder they have of the person. As to the young Iranian student, no that picture should only have been used, even though it is a very powerful visual enditement of the Iranian regime, with the consent of her nearest relatives.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
