Character assasination

[Lynne]

Thank you eps, you're so kind.

Standing up for friends is clearly not allowed, being a genuine lady who has a good reputation is not allowed either, i think the review system needs a serious overhaul, to stop this happening. perhaps you need to be a member for longer than a day to actually submit a review.

Its so funny actually that a genuine reviewer who sees different girls thinks i am wonderful chatty etc etc, but another who has just joined thinks i am awful, dont french kiss and terrible...amazing the variety of opinion.

I'm genuinely hurt by this. There are so many totally nice gentleman that i meet here in Ireland. Pity that there are few around that are so nasty. Nobody likes snide comments or to be reviewed badly. if i honestly believed that i had done something wrong or not gotten along, i would understand a bad review. But a clear dagger directed at me isn't called for.

[Epsilon]

Thank you eps, you're so kind.

Standing up for friends is clearly not allowed, being a genuine lady who has a good reputation is not allowed either, i think the review system needs a serious overhaul, to stop this happening. perhaps you need to be a member for longer than a day to actually submit a review.

Its so funny actually that a genuine reviewer who sees different girls thinks i am wonderful chatty etc etc, but another who has just joined thinks i am awful, dont french kiss and terrible...amazing the variety of opinion.

I'm genuinely hurt by this. There are so many totally nice gentleman that i meet here in Ireland. Pity that there are few around that are so nasty. Nobody likes snide comments or to be reviewed badly. if i honestly believed that i had done something wrong or not gotten along, i would understand a bad review. But a clear dagger directed at me isn't called for.

I dont read your reviews, because at this stage i know you are great, not just as an Escort but you are a genuine warm friendly and down to earth person.
It is a disgrace that any asshole can post a review, whether it is true or not and there is no real way of checking whether it is genuine. Yes the review system needs an overhaul, but to date, i dont think anybody has come up with any ideas on how to do that, Patricia may correct me oif im wrong.
A safe bet is to read the reviews of established punters/posters and make your own decisions. Even contact a punter who has been with a lady and ask his opinion. i dont think any punter would mind discussing ths with another poster.
If anybody has suggestion on how to improve this system. i'm sure patricia would love to hear them.
But in the meantime, if any body would like to know about Lynne, feel free to contact me. Because she is worth a visit, and deserves all of her good reviews.

[Alyssa Jenkins]

I just wanted to add a few words Lynne do not worry the people who do enjpoy your company know that you are great. Even if there are one or two bad reviews you have a ton of good positive reviews do not worry and just be your normal happy self hun take care and miss you xxxxx

[Forrest]

yes it seems i have now become the target of people trying to DISCREDIT my good reputation by joining the site specifically to write negative reviews.
Its such a shame that people have to stoop to this level.

I am sorry to hear that people have been posting negative reviews about you. I only met you a couple of times, and its going back a couple of years, but I can still remember what a nice, easy going, sexy lady you are. As Epsilon says, the review system has been abused and needs an overhaul but you shouldn't let it upset you too much. After all you know how good you are and so do a lot of the established members.

As a matter of interest, when reviews are being verified by EI, do they contact the escort first before publishing?

Maybe, if an escort is notified by pm of a bad review she can respond via EI to the reviewer challenging the review. If these reviewers had to put in a little more work in trying to discredit an escort maybe it would become less frequent. It may mean more work for EI but, as you are paying for advertising on their site and reviewers dont, EI should deal with it so you don't suffer unneccessarily.

[Brown Sugar]

Lynne, i know exactly what you are dealing with as it recently happened to me

Do not let it get to you { i know its hard}

Your positive reviews far outweigh the minor negative ones

Genuine clients who read the review system by now know how to spot a dodgy review.

Your an established escort= FACT

You provide a top class service= FACT

Your personality is bright and bubbly = FACT

Keep ya head up

Sugar xx

[Brown Sugar]

Lynne, i know exactly what you are dealing with as it recently happened to me

Do not let it get to you { i know its hard}

Your positive reviews far outweigh the minor negative ones

Genuine clients who read the review system by now know how to spot a dodgy review.

Your an established escort= FACT

You provide a top class service= FACT

Your personality is bright and bubbly = FACT

Keep ya head up

Sugar xx

[RicFlair]

Don't worry guys we're all looking into this matter.

We'll be back to ye about it later.

[Lynne]

honestly there should be a period of time that someone has to be a member before they are granted access to writing a review. Surely the site can implement something like that? For instance a one time reviewer who submits either a good review or bad review will be looked as a potential fake, but if each new member has to be a member for 2 weeks or a month before being granted review submitting status wouldn't that catch out many fake reviews that exist or are being submitted?

[intoall]

Lynne, you are one the most enjoyable ladies I have ever had the pleasure of spending time with. Chin up. One bad review is nothing. think of all the great ones you have.

Ric Flair, I totally with Lynne. How can a person join and a few hours later post a review that is quite obviously a fake. Also, do you not smell a RAT!! Plainly the review is fake.

[pats bodyguard]

honestly there should be a period of time that someone has to be a member before they are granted access to writing a review. Surely the site can implement something like that? For instance a one time reviewer who submits either a good review or bad review will be looked as a potential fake, but if each new member has to be a member for 2 weeks or a month before being granted review submitting status wouldn't that catch out many fake reviews that exist or are being submitted?

this will be happening very soon Lynne. there,s a new scheme coming in where a symbol is put beside trusted reviewers. a trusted reviewer will be someone who has 5 reviews or a genuine posting history of 10 posts. its all in the pipeline, the mods submitted 4 recommendations last week to patricia.