Exaggerated Reviews

[SheriffWooody]

Now let save it the pms and im sure he is speaking about myself. First of all if at 57 im overweight than you really need some glasses ( try specsavers) . I dont advertise as slim in my pics you can see i have big bum and big titties . You said that i use old photos when i was in my twenties you have right i had 29 when i took them and now im 31 ( oh yes big difference ))). Now lets speak about the complex: why TF did you come in first place if u dont like it ? ( where do you think you are ? In dubai?) . The reason i didnt change my photos even if i have 6 months after i gave birth is because i think i look the same as before ( the selfies i will attach here will speak for themself) . Now spare me with all this bullshit that im ugly and overweight and other words . Go and have a look in the mirror . Attachment 129193

i think your GORGEOUS Bridgitte, not surprised many other do to, don't pay attention to negative people. Everyone, Hit thanks if you agree. Some guys aren't living in the real world, they are in cloud cuckoo land

[denis01]

I started this thread. It was in response to a meeting I had with one particular escort, but this has happened to me five or six times in the last few years, so it is not about this escort.

The thread is about overly positive reviews left by clients who I think are too grateful to the escort and so only give glowing reports that are not connected with reality. The thread title is “Exaggerated reviews”. Nowhere does it mention any escort or escorts.

I have not named the escort I saw this week, and will not name her, as it is not about her, it is about the people leaving reviews.

The outrage from the escorts posting here is absurd; wanting to have this thread removed is utterly ridiculous. Of course it is in some escorts’ interests to only get positive reviews and they would prefer if we, the clients, really did think that they are doing us a favour. Of course they are not doing us a favour, we are paying for a service, and that is my point. We should treat escorts with respect at all times, but let’s not pretend that money isn’t involved.

[David Feckem]

Couldn’t say that better
I think on the end you review all package. And mainly your experience and how you felt. Even she didn’t look exactly like on photos. Well I don’t. I am the same. Ha I love photoshop and want look better on photos. Like how I wish to look I guess. On selfies that’s me. Of course. But when you going to the pro. You want to look like superstar

6k... well dunno. But know the girls who paid 2-3k all the time. Mine were most expensive 2k. Usually €700-1.000. Good to update them every year or two. I do every 2nd year.

I agree it’s all about the full experience with an escort. If her photos are glamorized a little, an expression of how she wants to be that can be okay. Because a photo won’t capture her personality, her sexiness, the feel of her, and how she makes you feel fantastic for an hour with her. And after an hour of great sex with her and endorphins rushing around the body a lad will probably be inclined to think the escort is just as sexy if not sexier than her glamorized photos.
Some bitter lads posting shows how much they resent they have to pay for it.


Khloe Kardashian, and how she posts on instagram after face tuning her own photos. Getting a hard time for it, but that's beside the point.






If Khloe answered the door and you said you’re not like your photos and walked away, I suppose you could be in the right. But if she took you inside and gave you the ride of your life, you’d probably think after, she’s even sexier than the face tuned photo. I know which path I'd rather tread.

[SteveB]

I was curious who the escort was. Now I know.

The original poster left, which is his right, because it is his money, so he didn't really get to know the escort.
I think that was a mistake, but, again, that is his choice and I am not criticising it.
I think it is easy to perhaps be under a bit of pressure going to see someone. On top of that you are directed to a run-down area with grotty flats. Perhaps when the door opens and you walk in, you are in a small, dark grotty room with a girl who is not particularly tall, (let’s face it, very tall people, both male and female are more striking, especially at first glance) and she has gone to the trouble of making herself up, and possibly looks well, but at first glance appears to be “caked in make-up”. Under such circumstances it is easy to just think to yourself, F**k it,” and leave.
Don’t get me wrong, I am not criticising the OP, just adding my opinion.

I will admit I am one of the reviewers who left a good review. A lot of the escorts I have reviewed I cannot remember several months, or years later. When I do remember an escort it is usually because something memorable happened, not even necessarily with the escort, or because she was either very bad or very good.
I am not defending my five-star review simply to defend myself or my review; I would defend it because I DO remember her and for all the right, good reasons.
It is pointless talking about her as an escort because the OP left with really meeting her but some reviewers had stated she didn’t do all her favourites but my pleasant recollection is she did, and did GFE and the rest very well.

As for her appearance, I did think she was very pretty, and she had a very good figure. In my recollection, I saw her in one of the better locations and perhaps, better lit and perhaps got a better look at her! That was over three years ago and I know she has possibly changed her look since then.

My review was not “exaggerated” or “gushing”. Perhaps, in the light of this thread, just as well.
However, the reason my review was not “exaggerated” is because I probably wrote it in a hurry!
I would have no problems in writing an exaggerated review for her and I would unhesitatingly recommend her. I would certainly like to see her again but she is seldom close to me and when she was I was too busy.

[beautyaddict]

I blame their parents

Genius you made me laugh, several years ago I suggested some date stamp type thing on photos . Reviews work and do not work no more no less . Perfect definitely not but better than no reviews

Is it a surprise that Advertisers are less than happy with this thread ? It does not get more personal than what can be written in a review. The Advertisers are standing together in support of each other, good for them

Ordinary Joe posts that brilliant thread well mainly he does , many of the photos do zero for me , some make me believe in Divine creation (Not Rachel Divine !! just sayin never met her.
Reviews are a guide not a guarantee, some I flat out ignore
I see that this has become personal now whether by choice or not , that is not good however it happened. The Clients here will move on a bit disgruntled others are left with longer term effects. Give it some thought as you hit the keyboard perhaps.

[SheriffWooody]

Genius you made me laugh, several years ago I suggested some date stamp type thing on photos . Reviews work and do not work no more no less . Perfect definitely not but better than no reviews

Is it a surprise that Advertisers are less than happy with this thread ? It does not get more personal than what can be written in a review. The Advertisers are standing together in support of each other, good for them

Ordinary Joe posts that brilliant thread well mainly he does , many of the photos do zero for me , some make me believe in Divine creation (Not Rachel Divine !! just sayin never met her.
Reviews are a guide not a guarantee, some I flat out ignore
I see that this has become personal now whether by choice or not , that is not good however it happened. The Clients here will move on a bit disgruntled others are left with longer term effects. Give it some thought as you hit the keyboard perhaps.

i wish I hadn't put up her photos now, I hope she and others don't take offence. I did have her best interest at heart.

OP reminded me a little of myself when I first started punting, expecting way too much. I always had the idea of this perfectly formed, small, petite escort without any blemishes. Suppose everyone has their own type.

But one of many things punting taught me is to appreciate women in all shapes and sizes. Now, my thinking has completely changed, I'm not bothered to meet small escorts and my favorite ladies have more curves on them. Besides all of that, it should be also about the way the escort holds herself as a lady, the beauty within, maybe she has a special face, or special eyes or maybe the way she talks and so on, so many other aspects should be taken into consideration. OP is just being complete short sighted.

[FinnMickC00L]

[FinnMickC00L]

[SheriffWooody]

[SheriffWooody]

I started this thread. It was in response to a meeting I had with one particular escort, but this has happened to me five or six times in the last few years, so it is not about this escort.

The thread is about overly positive reviews left by clients who I think are too grateful to the escort and so only give glowing reports that are not connected with reality. The thread title is “Exaggerated reviews”. Nowhere does it mention any escort or escorts.

I have not named the escort I saw this week, and will not name her, as it is not about her, it is about the people leaving reviews.

The outrage from the escorts posting here is absurd; wanting to have this thread removed is utterly ridiculous. Of course it is in some escorts’ interests to only get positive reviews and they would prefer if we, the clients, really did think that they are doing us a favour. Of course they are not doing us a favour, we are paying for a service, and that is my point. We should treat escorts with respect at all times, but let’s not pretend that money isn’t involved.

short and simple. You are expecting too much. Probably 90% of guys are going to find this girl to be rated 100%.