Liar, liar Mia Belgium

[nicegirlsarenice]

I think it is very self-centered, arrogant, belittling, cold-hearted, and unfactual, and inexperienced for Nicegirls to say all this.

Let me repeat, I think what Nice girls has said is:
self centered
arrogant
belittling
cold-hearted
unfactual
inexperienced

Nads was bait and switched and whatever way someone wants to twist it around, it is wrong to bait and switch and that is that! And he was struck one hit by the bait and switch, and a 2nd hit by the nasty comments she made to him. She also threatened him, and dont tell me that is not a scary feeling to be threatened!! Nice girls, you have no right to stand on your pedestal and say these things to a man who has been cheated and insulted. I am truely turned off by your behavior on this subject.

*shrugs* I don't really care.

[DollyDarling]

Well I didnt say that. But then again, you dont seem to read things all the way thru and go back and recheck as you should do. Dont quote someone unless you get it right. And dont put words that were not said in someone's mouth. THANKS!

[DollyDarling]

*shrugs* I don't really care.

You dont care? Then why are talking so much here? Why are you acting like an expert? And why do INSIST on having the last word on anything and everything?

Gee, think about it...

[nicegirlsarenice]

You dont care? Then why are talking so much here? Why are you acting like an expert? And why do INSIST on having the last word on anything and everything?

Gee, think about it...

Because for the past about 12 posts in this topic I've had to come back to answer a question or something..... I'm not insisting, I just had things thrown at me or questions etc.

[luther]

Well he has every right to be upset over that alright.

So if you see it why are you still having a go at him and defending her???

I think he should make a rebuttal on the review where more people will actually see it and not on the board itself.

I don't think more people would see it on the review, how many times do people, once they read a review, go back over it again, and just how many rebuttals would you allow on each rewiew???

Isn't that what the forum is for....... a little information sharing and debate...........

Maybe it was a simple misunderstanding etc.

And if that's what it was he has given her the chance here to explain that, she has the ability to reply to a review but not on this thread???

he was trying to destroy the escorts reputation

As opposed to what she was doing to him in her reply to the rewiew???

Nads hadn't done anything wrong, she did by her own admission with the bait and switch thing, he was only defending himself............

[Punter John]

I think it's hilarious that women always go after the penis when they're mad. She said you had a "limp dick". They love to imasculate us... just an observation.

She pulled the old bait and switch. She's admited as much as well. When is her ad gonna get pulled?

[Punter John]

Well I didnt say that. But then again, you dont seem to read things all the way thru and go back and recheck as you should do. Dont quote someone unless you get it right. And dont put words that were not said in someone's mouth. THANKS!

Dolly when are you gonna finally come and visit us in Dublin? You'd make your plane fare back on the first day of seeing punters.

[nicegirlsarenice]

So if you see it why are you still having a go at him and defending her???

I'm not, I'm not attacking him while he and that other guy did attack me. I stated my position to begin with, if he didn't want to ask for his money back he shouldn't have thrown it down.

I don't think more people would see it on the review, how many times do people, once they read a review, go back over it again, and just how many rebuttals would you allow on each rewiew???

But shur.... the review is going to be read many times the amount it's been read already. Not everyone reads every single review as they come up and can remember them all perfectly....

Isn't that what the forum is for....... a little information sharing and debate...........

Yeah you're right it is. I just think it was a bit much. TheNads has a right to give his side of it and I have a right to disagree with it and some insinuations.

And if that's what it was he has given her the chance here to explain that, she has the ability to reply to a review but not on this thread???

She can if she wants, but she shouldn't feel obliged to. Then after she started someone might say something else forcing her to reply again and the same with other escorts.... the amount of escorts that use the message board regularly would be about 0.5% or less literally!!! I don't know why they don't use it more and made a topic about it before.

But it would set a precedent not just for her, but that all other escorts should come on and defend themselves as well from complaints on the message board. I think that's a bit ridiculous. As Patricia said you can retort as many times as you like on the reviews... this forum is for extra warnings but there's only so much detail that can really be worth that much. This is called e-drama.

As opposed to what she was doing to him in her reply to the rewiew???

Nads hadn't done anything wrong, she did by her own admission with the bait and switch thing, he was only defending himself............

Yeah, as opposed to that. This is sort of like going behind her back and that's one of the worst things anyone can ever do. I messaged her about this so at least she'd know it was here.

I do think TheNads should be posting about it if he wants after her allegations, I just don't agree with some aspects of the topic. And if he wants to pull rank and others want to join in that's fine, all I was saying from the beginning was that I'm not on board with it.

[luther]

if he didn't want to ask for his money back he shouldn't have thrown it down.

Again you're missing the point. I can't speak for Nads but I'm sure it's not just about that, it's about her reply to the review in which she said those things about him........

But shur.... the review is going to be read many times the amount it's been read already. Not everyone reads every single review as they come up and can remember them all perfectly....

And that's my point, this thread has already received more than 1,700 views, many more than the review........... I'm sure that's the effect Nads was looking for....... If the comments were just confined to the review people wouldn'd be able to give their opinion, or disagree, as you say, and on that......

Yeah you're right it is. I just think it was a bit much. TheNads has a right to give his side of it and I have a right to disagree with it and some insinuations.

Yes you have the right to disagree, but what's with the insinuations???

She can if she wants, but she shouldn't feel obliged to.

No she shouldn't feel obliged, but it seems she had no problem with with replying to the review..........

This is called e-drama.

That's not the title I would have put on it at this particular moment but each to their own eh........

This is sort of like going behind her back and that's one of the worst things anyone can ever do. I messaged her about this so at least she'd know it was here.

I do think TheNads should be posting about it if he wants after her allegations

Well done on the PM thing, but how did you explain it???

First you said it's going behind her back and then you said Nads should be posting about it here, so which is it???

And if he wants to pull rank and others want to join in that's fine, all I was saying from the beginning was that I'm not on board with it.

And finally, now exactly is he "pulling rank" here???

By posting about an escort???

Surely you're not suggesting that punters are of a higher rank than escorts???

God I hope not............. I hope that's not how you view escorts or women......... I really hope that's not it...................

[nicegirlsarenice]

Again you're missing the point. I can't speak for Nads but I'm sure it's not just about that, it's about her reply to the review in which she said those things about him........

But if you go back you can see Nads bringing all the rest of it into it as well. And THAT'S the bit I think is a bit much.

And that's my point, this thread has already received more than 1,700 views, many more than the review........... I'm sure that's the effect Nads was looking for....... If the comments were just confined to the review people wouldn'd be able to give their opinion, or disagree, as you say, and on that......

True enough.

No she shouldn't feel obliged, but it seems she had no problem with with replying to the review..........

Well.... maybe considering she did bait&switch she could have been less caustic in her reply. I don't know whether she made that stuff up about him but I think it's unlikely.

Well done on the PM thing, but how did you explain it???

I just alerted to her that there was something going on here.

First you said it's going behind her back and then you said Nads should be posting about it here, so which is it???

Again, everything except the bad points:

* Calling her a liar when she may have made a genuine mistake.
* Saying she should post on her and defend herself instead of using the review section which is what really matters and where a lot of things don't get lost a few pages later...
* Saying things like "Go F*CK yourself Mia, 'cos if I have my way no one else will want to ! ".... that's not a nice thing to say to someone whose livelihood depends on it, it's threatening.
* Someone said they hoped it would destroy the escort's reputation.
* Generally complaining so much even though he got what he wanted, it was mission accomplished. I mean... did he not go home a happy punter? She didn't show him to some ugly slag. She just made a mistake about his identity (apparently, I believe him on that).

And finally, now exactly is he "pulling rank" here???

By posting about an escort???

Surely you're not suggesting that punters are of a higher rank than escorts???

God I hope not............. I hope that's not how you view escorts or women......... I really hope that's not it...................

Nooooo no no.... come on are you having a laugh? With the way I treat my owner Magnificent AnnaS? Oh how I love Magnificent AnnaS. Anyway...

He was pulling rank by saying how he's known and regarded well by many around here. And I'm sure he is a fairly dependable guy for pointing out the good escorts. However... he seems a bit too critical and too selfish to me. And then to come and attack ME just because I wouldn't also go along with him. Patricia also pointed out that the best place to sort out differences is in the review section, not terrorising escorts and threatening that they won't get any clients anymore. This is their livelihoods, it's not a thing that should be messed around and played games with.