Unverified Photos

[mrshankly]

I’m curious as to why somebody would leave a No Service review because when they turned up the girl looked nothing like the girl on her profile pictures so they left immediately. But it quite clearly states on her profile that the pictures are unverified. Surely that’s to be expected. Seems a waste of time even allowing the review to stand. Maybe I’m missing something.

[TheKinkyMasseuse]

I’m curious as to why somebody would leave a No Service review because when they turned up the girl looked nothing like the girl on her profile pictures so they left immediately. But it quite clearly states on her profile that the pictures are unverified. Surely that’s to be expected. Seems a waste of time even allowing the review to stand. Maybe I’m missing something.

My photos here are unverified but they certainly are me i have ten years of reviews on another site to prove it. To get your photos verified you only need to be wearing the same outfit holding a piece of paper with todays date on you don't even need to show your face so i would not put to much into it unless the ladies who show their faces on their photos have to show their face on their verification photo and then I am just talking bolloxs as usual.. good night x

[mrshankly]

Thanks for that TheKinkyMasseuse.
But what I mean is what is the point of allowing a negative review about a girl that was not like her profile pictures when the pictures are clearly unverified. Surely the review shouldn’t even be published in the 1st place.

[TheKinkyMasseuse]

Thanks for that TheKinkyMasseuse.
But what I mean is what is the point of allowing a negative review about a girl that was not like her profile pictures when the pictures are clearly unverified. Surely the review shouldn’t even be published in the 1st place.

I really do not know how the review system here works but in general I think ladies who are advertising should be trusted to put correct photos of themselves up regardless if they are verified or not anything else is just bad form and they deserve a negative x

[Heisenberg30]

I’ve looked at an escorts profile today because I’d decided to visit her next time she was in Derry but she has new pics up of a totally different woman, no comparison whatsoever to her old pics, it’s getting to be more of a lottery everyday, I’ll stick to ladies I’ve met before from now on 😀

[RayDonovan]

Thanks for that TheKinkyMasseuse.
But what I mean is what is the point of allowing a negative review about a girl that was not like her profile pictures when the pictures are clearly unverified. Surely the review shouldn’t even be published in the 1st place.

I don't think it does any harm to leave it published. It just states the truth. There are enough reviews removed already without asking for more reasons to allow reviews to be removed.

[RayDonovan]

I’ve looked at an escorts profile today because I’d decided to visit her next time she was in Derry but she has new pics up of a totally different woman, no comparison whatsoever to her old pics, it’s getting to be more of a lottery everyday, I’ll stick to ladies I’ve met before from now on ��

And were both different sets verified?

[Heisenberg30]

And were both different sets verified?

Second set def wasn’t verified but the first set was, same name and reviews associated with escort no 1 but the profile has had some details altered and some left untouched to suit the new pics, I was just thinking that the escort or escorts in question must think punters have the retentive ability of a goldfish, the pictures are poles apart, she has sprouted from 5,4 to 5,11��, don’t want to name names but it’s so bare faced, the old pics are still attached to the reviews.

[Heisenberg30]

How many times do you look at a profile of a new escort and see that she has one review and it’s nearly always from a client who is writing his first review because he “doesn’t normally review but this lady is so special” I thank the stars daily that I have a few ladies I see regularly and I generally don’t have to play pot luck based on these types of reviews

[Heisenberg30]

Second set def wasn’t verified but the first set was, same name and reviews associated with escort no 1 but the profile has had some details altered and some left untouched to suit the new pics, I was just thinking that the escort or escorts in question must think punters have the retentive ability of a goldfish, the pictures are poles apart, she has sprouted from 5,4 to 5,11��, don’t want to name names but it’s so bare faced, the old pics are still attached to the reviews.

Just noticed the official edit, speculation lol. That’s like speculating that a one legged man might not be the best footballer in the world, whoever approved the pics on the profile should head to Specsavers,