Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 124

Thread: Rafaella doesn't get a 5 star review.

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    1,401
    Reviews
    49

    Default

    My bad

    Quote Originally Posted by Nikkita View Post
    Im talking about the Op and jamescork. Not the reviewer

    So we're all on the same page

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    1,401
    Reviews
    49

    Default

    Thank you to the person who gave me a negative rep for this post, coward won't call me out in public then so be it, I'm good and so are the people who agree with me.
    If you have an issue with my opinion then show yourself or shut the fuck up coward!

    Quote Originally Posted by funboy71 View Post
    You know my philosophy on reviews Nikkita, Be true but be fair as we don't know what you ladies go through each day,
    I say a bad review should be allowed only if you have visited the same lady more than once!
    Last edited by funboy71; 07-12-19 at 02:09. Reason: A tool is a useful thing ;)

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    355
    Reviews
    299

    Default

    Have no doubt that Rafaella has a wonderful bod judging by the various posts here but if a review isn't simply a reflection of an individual punter's own view of his own experience then what is it?

    Surely, we are not at the stage here that a less than positive review generates the kind of blowback that discourages reviewers expressing an opinion?

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Patt113 For This Useful Post:

    JAMESCORK (07-12-19), Mij (07-12-19)

  5. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,917
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by funboy71 View Post
    Thank you to the person who gave me a negative rep for this post, coward won't call me out in public then so be it, I'm good and so are the people who agree with me.
    If you have an issue with my opinion then show yourself or shut the fuck up coward!
    Well it wasnt me

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Nikkita For This Useful Post:

    funboy71 (07-12-19)

  7. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,917
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Patt113 View Post
    Have no doubt that Rafaella has a wonderful bod judging by the various posts here but if a review isn't simply a reflection of an individual punter's own view of his own experience then what is it?

    Surely, we are not at the stage here that a less than positive review generates the kind of blowback that discourages reviewers expressing an opinion?
    If u call me fat next week there will be a reckoning. Ive dropped a dress size x

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Nikkita For This Useful Post:

    funboy71 (07-12-19)

  9. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    355
    Reviews
    299

    Default

    Hope you're not shrinking that body too much. I remember it being just right xx.

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Patt113 For This Useful Post:

    funboy71 (07-12-19), Nikkita (07-12-19), Rafaella25 (07-12-19)

  11. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    399
    Reviews
    45

    Default

    Not sure why I am posting here because I'm basically saying this thread is pointless.
    Over 300 reviews, 99% recommending, 98% would see her again.
    An outlier punter posts a review. It happens. The review was probably genuine, he or she could have been tired, not unusual.
    Verdict, based on stats, this review can be ignored for the most part.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Mij For This Useful Post:


  13. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,917
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Patt113 View Post
    Hope you're not shrinking that body too much. I remember it being just right xx.
    I'm a skinny bitch now

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Nikkita For This Useful Post:

    funboy71 (07-12-19)

  15. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,917
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mij View Post
    Not sure why I am posting here because I'm basically saying this thread is pointless.
    Over 300 reviews, 99% recommending, 98% would see her again.
    An outlier punter posts a review. It happens. The review was probably genuine, he or she could have been tired, not unusual.
    Verdict, based on stats, this review can be ignored for the most part.
    Well I think it was pointless unless this twit wanted to vindictively point it out. I'm not sure that he has Raefaellas best interests to heart

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Nikkita For This Useful Post:

    Mij (07-12-19)

  17. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,917
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DummyResister View Post
    The OP was looking to stir shit. A cursory glance through his history should be all the proof one needs.
    The guy who posted the review (Twentyeight) is a solid reviewer who's always been a perfect gentleman here and doesn't deserve this shit at all.
    The head hunters on this thread would do well to shut the fuck up.
    Yes sir, no sir, 3 bags full sir

    Who the fuck do you think you're talking to?

Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •