Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 52

Thread: Suggestions on how to improve the review system...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Suggestions on how to improve the review system...

    So there has been a lot of talk about how bad the review system is at the moment, so rather than just going around in circles bitching about it, can we get some suggestions from everybody on how to improve it???

    I've seen some suggestions already, like limiting the amount of reviews one punter can give one girl etc. etc...........

    So lets get them in here and see what can be done................
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,238
    Reviews
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    So there has been a lot of talk about how bad the review system is at the moment, so rather than just going around in circles bitching about it, can we get some suggestions from everybody on how to improve it???

    I've seen some suggestions already, like limiting the amount of reviews one punter can give one girl etc. etc...........

    So lets get them in here and see what can be done................
    One good idea i've heard is to have a num of posts you must reach before you can post a review that would at least cut out the people setting up 10 profiles to leave fake reviews as they'd also have to have alot of posts to acompany them...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,876
    Blog Entries
    65
    Reviews
    38

    Exclamation Oooops...

    Quote Originally Posted by big daddy 69 View Post
    One good idea i've heard is to have a num of posts you must reach before you can post a review that would at least cut out the people setting up 10 profiles to leave fake reviews as they'd also have to have alot of posts to acompany them...
    But that would mean Scankman's reviews would not be considered real.

    Like he ain't gonna post here.
    Escort of the Month and E-I Interview Blogs; http://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/blogs/ricflair/

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RicFlair View Post
    But that would mean Scankman's reviews would not be considered real.

    Like he ain't gonna post here.

    In fairness,
    i think we are talking about new reviewers

    27

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,876
    Blog Entries
    65
    Reviews
    38

    Wink I know but...

    Quote Originally Posted by twentyseven View Post
    In fairness,
    i think we are talking about new reviewers

    27
    I'm aware of that NB3/27/Kliati Moskali.

    How would we create a program that would spot the difference?

    Any thoughts?
    Escort of the Month and E-I Interview Blogs; http://www.escort-ireland.com/boards/blogs/ricflair/

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    304

    Default clitty musky lol

    Quote Originally Posted by RicFlair View Post
    I'm aware of that NB3/27/Kliati Moskali.

    How would we create a program that would spot the difference?

    Any thoughts?
    i didnt know 27 was some sort of russian computer program designer ffs

    you dont need a program, just someone with a bit of sense and experience of reviewing and reading reviews to put a verified reviewer symbol beside their name. simple!
    Last edited by pats bodyguard; 09-06-09 at 16:13.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,238
    Reviews
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RicFlair View Post
    But that would mean Scankman's reviews would not be considered real.

    Like he ain't gonna post here.
    True but i'm sure if it was a requirement of a minimum posts he would of at least done that as he was serious about the review system and has put in the hours so a few posts wouldnt of been much of an obsticle..

  8. #8

    Default I think verified reviewer symbol is a good idea.

    I think the only thing with someone having to make a certain amount of posts is that not everyone enjoys the forums on many sites worldwide some people just dont post things. I do believe that like some sites where reviewers have a different tier system starting at a colour and then moving up it would make alot of sense like you could say first 10 reviews puts you in a green member then 20 reviews puts you in a silver 30 in a gold and maybe 40 platinum just as an example because the minute someone actually has gold or platinum status this would make it that thier reviews are found to be totally reliable. I think this may work and I know it sounds like hard work to implement it to begin with but I think this could work out so its the emblem that gives the reviewer the status this also will help ladies taking appointments from members as obviously those with a higher tier level are verified already. Just my 2cents dont know what you guys think xxxx
    Will MISS you all... For those of you that will keep in touch you know how to do this.... Take Care Kisses Alyssa Jenkins xxxx

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alyssa Jenkins View Post
    I think the only thing with someone having to make a certain amount of posts is that not everyone enjoys the forums on many sites worldwide some people just dont post things. I do believe that like some sites where reviewers have a different tier system starting at a colour and then moving up it would make alot of sense like you could say first 10 reviews puts you in a green member then 20 reviews puts you in a silver 30 in a gold and maybe 40 platinum just as an example because the minute someone actually has gold or platinum status this would make it that thier reviews are found to be totally reliable. I think this may work and I know it sounds like hard work to implement it to begin with but I think this could work out so its the emblem that gives the reviewer the status this also will help ladies taking appointments from members as obviously those with a higher tier level are verified already. Just my 2cents dont know what you guys think xxxx

    good idea miss jenkins........

    maybe if its starts at maybe 5 reviews you could leave the reviewer at unverified till he hits that mark..............then people browing reviews could disregards any reviews from punters under five unless they have a credibale message board history.


    27

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alyssa Jenkins View Post
    have a different tier system starting at a colour and then moving up it would make alot of sense like you could say first 10 reviews puts you in a green member then 20 reviews puts you in a silver 30 in a gold and maybe 40 platinum just as an example because the minute someone actually has gold or platinum status this would make it that thier reviews are found to be totally reliable.
    I was thinking about this earlier Alyssa, and something occured to me. Before you know it Scankman, zobaanzoo, ninebythree, ber, dreamon and petercork would all be punting for free.... or getting paid just for publishing reviews........

    Word would get around, especially to new girls coming in, that if you can secure a positive review from one of these lads you're sorted........

    Best of luck lads..........
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •