Suggestions on how to improve the review system...

[pats bodyguard]

More seriously, I do have a few constructive ideas. More reviews would be good. With more real reviews the fake ones would matter less. I know that's obvious, but there are a few things the site could do to encourage more reviews. The first is to stop losing reviews. Most people whose reviews go missing are not going to resubmit them and may not submit any more in the future. It would help if we could see a list of pending reviews, so we know whether our reviews are in the queue or lost forever. Another thing that would help is something I've suggested several times now: we should be able to review escorts whose tours have just ended. All of the above would mean more reviews.

You can go ahead with various trusted reviewer schemes, but personally I will just ignore them. I can already see from the top of the review how many posts and reviews the reviewer has. Having a lot of either isn't any guarantee of quality, of course. Westside has thousands of posts, but who would take his advice seriously? Petercork has 51 reviews, but only 13 are positive! I wouldn't take a negative review from him very seriously. I'm not saying I don't look at the number of reviews a reviewer has. I do, but I also click on it to see who he's reviewed and how.

Finally, a minor point. Could someone please fix the problem with the location always being the escort's current location. I am sick of reading "this appointment was really in Ballydung, but the review system won't let me choose that."

It would help if we could see a list of pending reviews, so we know whether our reviews are in the queue or lost forever.

we should be able to review escorts whose tours have just ended. All of the above would mean more reviews.

fix the problem with the location always being the escort's current location. I am sick of reading "this appointment was really in Ballydung, but the review system won't let me choose that.

all good points el gordo, i think all worth putting into luther,s review suggestion box that he,s going to present to Patricia when everything has been discussed.

cheers
pb

[luther]

all good points el gordo, i think all worth putting into luther,s review suggestion box that he,s going to present to Patricia when everything has been discussed.

cheers
pb

And I'm in the final phase of dinner arrengements with Particia.......... as with all my dates the final hurdle being, actually letting the lady in question know about the date and getting the to agree........

Restraining orders are a real pain sometimes..........................

So keep the suggestions coming in, it won't change by bitching about it, it we can get enough suggestions together hopefully we can improve things............ So keep em comin.........

[pats bodyguard]

And I'm in the final phase of dinner arrengements with Particia.......... as with all my dates the final hurdle being, actually letting the lady in question know about the date and getting the to agree........

Restraining orders are a real pain sometimes..........................

So keep the suggestions coming in, it won't change by bitching about it, it we can get enough suggestions together hopefully we can improve things............ So keep em comin.........

to get back to the most important thread in this whole forum

.....so heres the suggestions

1. a link in posters profiles to their reviews.

2. a list of pending reviews

3. location and date setting fixed in reviews to account for actual location

4. a trusted reviewer mark beside real reviewers.

thanks
pb

[luther]

4. a trusted reviewer mark beside real reviewers.

thanks
pb

It has to be someone who wrote at least 5 reviews for 5 different girls though, I wouldn't trust someone who wrote 5 reviews for 1 escort (or 20 reviews for one girl and 20 for another girl).

Thanks Anna.........

[luther]

Don't know if these are in your recommendations but if not you might consider adding them

Limit the number of reviews that a poster can make for the same girl the current system is being distorted by a number of reviewers leaving over 10 reviews for the same girl. ( for example the girl currently on top of the most reviewed list has 23 reviews from just 2 posters in fact the last review from one of them specifically mentions that his latest review will move her to the top of the list demonstrating that he is fully aware that he is distorting the review system with the aim of improving the profile of a particular escort)

Ratted reviews should not be counted at all in the total number of reviews currently even ratted reviews offer an advantage in that they can still put a girl on the top 30 list

Thanks for the input Stewie...........

[luther]

but then, in the top reviewed girl list would it make much difference in publicity between the top 3?


also, i became a regular with a girl once, if i had have reviewed her 10 of those times the scores out of 10 would be 10. 10 8. 8.8. 7. 7.7. 5 and 1. all for the same girl so, i doubt a girl can be 10 or 9,s all the time

Good point PB............

[luther]

Well for example if you remove 13 of those reviews allowing each of those posters to post 5 reviews max that girl is back to 67 remove the 7 ratted reviews and that is 60 and leaves her mid table.

Allowing 5 reviews allows for a poster to update punters if there us a significant change in standard of service without allowing posters to deliberately distort the review system by posting a review for every visit. Many girls have regular clients who visit once or twice or more a week if these guys left a review every time.
Chocoman had his multiple reviews of the same girl ratted.

Presumably if you visit a girl 13 times you are happy with the service no need to tell us the same thing 13 times

Well said Stewie.......

[ninebythree]

loads of input and still no results...............keep trying lads


nbt

[luther]

Changes are on the way niner............ but keep the suggestions comin............

[adogwithabone]

I would prpose five changes to the review system

1) Reviews would not be allowed until 1 month after the member has joined
2) Reviews with ears would automatically delete if not supported within 2 weeks
3) One-off reviews where nothing further is heard of the reviewer will auto delete after 2 months
4) Only one review per escort but previous reviews can be replaced
5) A tiered classification for reviewers. say bronze, silver and gold at say 5, 20 and 50

These ideas have been around for a long time, I am just putting them in the one spot for discussion