johnwin530 (28-09-19), Stephanie (28-09-19), Wolverine (28-09-19)
I would like to hear from any of the 38! and get there side of story.
Aren’t we all paying for sex in some way?
Mrbean76 (28-09-19)
very easily lad, what is the client there for, a massage even is considered the same now do you know and once its established she is an escort which is very easy, its over, the guards know well whats happening in these places, you are naive too here too as once the guards put pressure on the escorts to out you youre finished, its happening, you really think any escort is going to care about you who she may never see again and i dont blame the escorts for protecting themselves as its their livelihood and no one should blame them either
Last edited by TheKnight; 28-09-19 at 16:27.
A client could be there for company, or they might be a chancer who likes to try to coax escorts into having sex for free. Indeed, they could just be there for a massage, and contrary to what you say, this is NOT considered the same. The law talks about sexual gratification; a massage is not intrinsically sexual (otherwise every massage parlour in the country would have been shut down).
The woman being an established escort means fuck all. Someone being an escort doesn't mean that every single person they interact with is paying her for sex. Do you think when she has a problem with her sink and the plumber comes round, then the plumber must have paid her for sex?
I'm not naive, I just understand how criminal law works. Criminal law requires proof beyond all reasonable doubt. Saying "but mate, he must have done something!!" does not prove anything beyond reasonable doubt.
johnwin530 (28-09-19), Punter08 (28-09-19), S94310 (28-09-19)
JMastodon (28-09-19), johnwin530 (28-09-19), Punter08 (28-09-19)