Escort of the Month - Running Points Table Request

[Nikkita]

Hello Lads and ladettes

ESCORT OF THE MONTH

If anyone is bored and has some time on their hands please could you create a running points table according to the rules:

https://www.escort-ireland.com/escor...q-reviews.html

Apparently only the first occurrence of a 'reviewer' is counted (from the beginning of time - correct me if I'm wrong?) and reviewers need to have 10 reviews under their belt.

Please publish the info as it stands...

I have suggested that we need an instantaneous running points table when things get neck ad neck... Let me know if you agree?

Many Thanks
Nikkita

[Jinxed]

You should be good Nikkita. You worked the forum very good over the last while. You made many men want to see you. 3 days left.

That's if I'm reading it right. The other girl level on 9 with you has a lot of under 10 reviewers.

[Nikkita]

You should be good Nikkita. You worked the forum very good over the last while. You made many men want to see you. 3 days left.

That's if I'm reading it right. The other girl level on 9 with you has a lot of under 10 reviewers.

Lol Jinxy, I just issued a challenge for people to see if I'm as good as I say I am.

If you're good, you're good x

It's a win / win for all of us

[casman]

It's hard to see who's ahead with guys reviewing a lady everytime they see them, don't know why tbh

[Nikkita]

Hypothetically you could actually be one of the '16 review' girls and have stronger points depending on repetition and reviewers with more than 10 reviews. I can't check some of them because their adverts are not running.

The number of reviews that are calculated in the review section can be totally off to what a win would take?

What's the point of that?

[Nikkita]

So back to my original query - why can't we see who is in the lead for EOTM according to the rules of the competition?

Having an inflated number of reviews which are low quality in the competition section seems pointless?

Is it always a surprise every month as to who wins?

[willie wacker]

So back to my original query - why can't we see who is in the lead for EOTM according to the rules of the competition?

Having an inflated number of reviews which are low quality in the competition section seems pointless?

Is it always a surprise every month as to who wins?

Because it can be manipulated and it does be too.

Only the mods should know who’s winning tbh.
If someone is not too far behind they can get people to write reviews near the end of the month.
Do you not think it’s very suspicious that in the last 2 days of the month an escort will get a load of reviews ?

[Nikkita]

Because it can be manipulated and it does be too.

Only the mods should know who’s winning tbh.
If someone is not too far behind they can get people to write reviews near the end of the month.
Do you not think it’s very suspicious that in the last 2 days of the month an escort will get a load of reviews ?

Not if they're established reviewers? If the appointment happened then the review is legit!

I don't know why the 'under 10' reviewers are even counted until the last minute and then disqualified?

Does no one else think it's dodgy - it totally throws out the numbers?

[SteveB]

On a related point, I see Dublinman80 has three hundred reviews. Bit of a landmark.

But back on thread, running totals for EOTM would be interesting but what would be the unwanted consequences?

[willie wacker]

Not if they're established reviewers? If the appointment happened then the review is legit!

I don't know why the 'under 10' reviewers are even counted until the last minute and then disqualified?

Does no one else think it's dodgy - it totally throws out the numbers?

Because they may be a set up account to do just that.
After 10 reviews the mods will know if they are genuine of not.