![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
StevieD123
Hardly what I would call irrefutable evidence to be fair.
I’m not disputing the fact the guy was a sandwich or two short of a picnic...
And pointing out holes in the theory doesn’t make me a paedo apologist, I’m just sceptical of their motives and credibility given their past performance. Because “past performance” is the barometer we are using against Jackson is it not?