The Duchess and ... Sex Workers ...

[Stephanie]

London (CNN) -

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex wrote messages of support and empowerment for sex workers while on an unannounced visit to a charity with her husband Prince Harry on Friday.


'You are loved:' Meghan writes notes for sex workers
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/02/uk/me...ntl/index.html

[cum4me]

yes she was writing words of support on bananas for the street workers.
I live there and don't have any time for any of them, they are up their own asses and its all false

[Stephanie]

I am torn between the thoughts of she is acting from the right place, to that is quite patronising. I suppose the charity is there is help women who are not in their position by free will, but trafficked or payment of drug debt, or a controlling person in their lives, so in that regard, it is from the right place. But still from the other side......

I don’t see it as patronizing in the least ..

I think it came from a good place in her heart , though quite unorthodox for Royalty !

: just leave it to them Americans to ‘Act improper’ ! xx








And just imagine , in UK where society is not so jaded to ‘nice’ness , just imagine one of

the sex workers getting a handwritten good-thought on an otherwise boring whatever banana .

I say it’d make one’s day in a humdrum existence ..?

Maybe remind just One person that they Matter .

[SteveB]

I'm afraid I did see it as patronising. Maybe I'm wrong; I frequently am!


Supporting a charity that helps poor stupid misguided wimmin.

[SteveB]

I would have thought more of her support if it had come less judgmentally and without "help" that may not have been wanted.

[Punter08]

I would rather have seen her visit them in person.

[Stephanie]

I would have thought more of her support if it had come less judgmentally and without "help" that may not have been wanted.

The charity already exists - to help sex workers .

All she did was pop in and help out , scrawl some Happy Messages on bananas .

Why is that seen as wrong or patronizing ?

[Stephanie]

I'm afraid I did see it as patronising. Maybe I'm wrong; I frequently am!


Supporting a charity that helps poor stupid misguided wimmin.

Are you against charities that support sex workers ??



We are talking about UK here , Not Ruhama .